Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hoseong choi
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 1

    about DEG after cuffdiff

    hi all.

    i am working on soybean gene expression analysis with tophat/cuffdiff

    After cuffdiff run, I could get results about expression of genes from gene_exp.diff file

    In some case, I could not determine the exact expression of gene.

    For example,

    Glyma03g03100.2:1-1121 Healthy 24hpi OK 37.9054 13.4419 -1.49567 -2.46173 0.04 0.769321 no
    Glyma03g03100.2:1181-1853 Healthy 24hpi OK 43.4734 13.3734 -1.70077 -2.93749 0.02925 0.658614 no

    Glyma03g03100.2 is one gene. According to results, expression of this gene is divided into 2 fragment.

    In this case, how can I analysis gene expression of Glyma03g03100??
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Did this happen with all genes or just this one?

    I'm guessing that you supplied cufflinks with an annotation file (probably in GTF format). Can you post the lines relevant to that gene? I'm guessing that cufflinks got confused by the formatting for some reason and computed metrics per-exon, rather than per-gene/transcript.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Today, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...