Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bongbimit
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 29

    #1

    problem in variant calling with rna-seq

    hi all,
    i have a question about my problem in rna-seq with my sample.
    i have 25 different sample from 25 human and i sequence them by rna-seq to find variant calling by Tophat,mpileup and VarScan.
    My result is also good when some sample's SNP are found on dbSNP, but i have a problem when some sample have SNP in intron region(many reads is mapping into this SNP, it 's not a noise), how can i explain this problem ? is it noise in sequencing or is there some mechanism intron region can come with mature mRNA in human ?

    Thank you all.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    The annotations are not completely correct, so perhaps the exon/intron boundary is incorrect, or there is a previously unknown gene or exon there. Furthermore, some mutations can break splice sites so that they are missed. RNA-seq data often has a few reads that will map to non-exonic areas, possibly for other reasons... but usually not many to the same location.

    Comment

    • bongbimit
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 29

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      The annotations are not completely correct, so perhaps the exon/intron boundary is incorrect, or there is a previously unknown gene or exon there. Furthermore, some mutations can break splice sites so that they are missed. RNA-seq data often has a few reads that will map to non-exonic areas, possibly for other reasons... but usually not many to the same location.
      i think annotation which i had is correct (hg19 homo sapiens) and the % mapping of this snp is also high, but i will check your opinion about mutation because my mRNA is oncogene (cancer)

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        Originally posted by bongbimit View Post
        i think annotation which i had is correct (hg19 homo sapiens) and the % mapping of this snp is also high, but i will check your opinion about mutation because my mRNA is oncogene (cancer)
        I don't mean the annotation is "wrong", I just mean that it's neither complete nor perfect, just like the HG19 genome. And your note that the source is cancer does make the mutation theory more plausible.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...