Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bongbimit
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 29

    #1

    problem in variant calling with rna-seq

    hi all,
    i have a question about my problem in rna-seq with my sample.
    i have 25 different sample from 25 human and i sequence them by rna-seq to find variant calling by Tophat,mpileup and VarScan.
    My result is also good when some sample's SNP are found on dbSNP, but i have a problem when some sample have SNP in intron region(many reads is mapping into this SNP, it 's not a noise), how can i explain this problem ? is it noise in sequencing or is there some mechanism intron region can come with mature mRNA in human ?

    Thank you all.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    The annotations are not completely correct, so perhaps the exon/intron boundary is incorrect, or there is a previously unknown gene or exon there. Furthermore, some mutations can break splice sites so that they are missed. RNA-seq data often has a few reads that will map to non-exonic areas, possibly for other reasons... but usually not many to the same location.

    Comment

    • bongbimit
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 29

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      The annotations are not completely correct, so perhaps the exon/intron boundary is incorrect, or there is a previously unknown gene or exon there. Furthermore, some mutations can break splice sites so that they are missed. RNA-seq data often has a few reads that will map to non-exonic areas, possibly for other reasons... but usually not many to the same location.
      i think annotation which i had is correct (hg19 homo sapiens) and the % mapping of this snp is also high, but i will check your opinion about mutation because my mRNA is oncogene (cancer)

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        Originally posted by bongbimit View Post
        i think annotation which i had is correct (hg19 homo sapiens) and the % mapping of this snp is also high, but i will check your opinion about mutation because my mRNA is oncogene (cancer)
        I don't mean the annotation is "wrong", I just mean that it's neither complete nor perfect, just like the HG19 genome. And your note that the source is cancer does make the mutation theory more plausible.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...