Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SS00
    PhD Student
    • Jun 2012
    • 33

    #1

    TopHat 2 & Tophat for Illumina - Different FPKM?

    Hi all,

    First let me just say I am new to RNA-seq analysis. I have a weird issue in Galaxy where I am experiencing different transcript expression FPKM values when compared to my reference based on whether I use TopHat v2 or TopHat for Illumina.

    Here are my two workflows:
    1. FastQ file --> convert to Sanger FastQ with FastQ Trimmer --> Align with TopHat2 using built in reference mm10 ---> Run Cufflinks Single Read.

    2. FastQ file ..> convert to Sanger FastQ with FastQ Trimmer --> Align with Tophat for Illumina using built in reference mm10 ---> Run with Cufflinks Single Read.

    Option 1 results in Cufflinks FPKM values of 0 for all transcripts. Option 2 gives actual FPKM results.

    What is the difference between these two programs? The only difference I can notice (as I don't know how to ''view'' bam files as text) is in the insertions and deletions tables in TopHat on Galaxy. TopHat2 lists my insertions and deletions in first column based on chromosomes, followed by location. Tophat for Illumina gives me gene names in the format of ENSMUST00000022345, for example, followed by location.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
73 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...