Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeannine
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14

    #1

    MACS1.4 peak calling using files aligned to custom genome

    Hi,

    I've got a questions regarding MACS1.4, which I already posted in the MACS announcement forum. But as I didn't get any replies I thought I post it here and see if anyone can help.
    I'm working with highly repetitive gene regions that are not included in the current genome assemblies. I have a few ChIPseq files I need to align to these regions and to do so I added the repetitive sequences as additional chromosome to the genome assembly and used this custom genome for the alignment. The alignment output is fairly similar to the output I get when aligning it to the normal genome, however when I call peaks with MACS1.4.2 something weird is happening. MACS does call a similar amount of peaks, however the peaks are in different locations compared to the normal genome files and the FDR values are worse, which I think is a consequence of estimating a different fragment length.
    Here's the stderr:
    normal genome
    #1 tag size is determined as 50 bps
    #1 tag size = 50
    #1 total tags in treatment: 1826394
    #1 total tags in control: 40575275
    #1 finished!
    #2 Build Peak Model...
    #2 number of paired peaks: 20414
    #2 finished!
    #2 predicted fragment length is 337 bps

    custom genome
    #1 tag size is determined as 50 bps
    #1 tag size = 50
    #1 total tags in treatment: 2068421
    #1 total tags in control: 40188963
    #1 finished!
    #2 Build Peak Model...
    #2 number of paired peaks: 21543
    #2 finished!
    #2 predicted fragment length is 88 bps

    The script for both analyses is exactly the same (with defined bandwidth of 250), the only difference is the genome file.

    Any ideas what's going on and how to avoid the problem? I really would like to use only the custom genome in the future, but therefore I need to be sure that it does the same thing as the normal genome!

    Thanks,
    Jeannine

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...