Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeannine
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14

    #1

    MACS1.4 peak calling using files aligned to custom genome

    Hi,

    I've got a questions regarding MACS1.4, which I already posted in the MACS announcement forum. But as I didn't get any replies I thought I post it here and see if anyone can help.
    I'm working with highly repetitive gene regions that are not included in the current genome assemblies. I have a few ChIPseq files I need to align to these regions and to do so I added the repetitive sequences as additional chromosome to the genome assembly and used this custom genome for the alignment. The alignment output is fairly similar to the output I get when aligning it to the normal genome, however when I call peaks with MACS1.4.2 something weird is happening. MACS does call a similar amount of peaks, however the peaks are in different locations compared to the normal genome files and the FDR values are worse, which I think is a consequence of estimating a different fragment length.
    Here's the stderr:
    normal genome
    #1 tag size is determined as 50 bps
    #1 tag size = 50
    #1 total tags in treatment: 1826394
    #1 total tags in control: 40575275
    #1 finished!
    #2 Build Peak Model...
    #2 number of paired peaks: 20414
    #2 finished!
    #2 predicted fragment length is 337 bps

    custom genome
    #1 tag size is determined as 50 bps
    #1 tag size = 50
    #1 total tags in treatment: 2068421
    #1 total tags in control: 40188963
    #1 finished!
    #2 Build Peak Model...
    #2 number of paired peaks: 21543
    #2 finished!
    #2 predicted fragment length is 88 bps

    The script for both analyses is exactly the same (with defined bandwidth of 250), the only difference is the genome file.

    Any ideas what's going on and how to avoid the problem? I really would like to use only the custom genome in the future, but therefore I need to be sure that it does the same thing as the normal genome!

    Thanks,
    Jeannine

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...