Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patouch74
    Member
    • May 2014
    • 16

    Best method to get functional annotation ?

    Hi

    I have metagenomic contigs from an assembly. I'm looking for a pipeline to get functional annotation.
    I've used the soft FragGeneScan to get ORF that I mapped with Interproscan with Pfam and Tiger database.

    But it takes too long (I have 70 000 sequences out from FragGeneScan) so I'm asking if there is a better way to get automatic functional annotation ?

    I need GO numbers for my output .
    Thanks for your helps.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Perhaps blast2go is faster?

    Comment

    • patouch74
      Member
      • May 2014
      • 16

      #3
      I will try

      Comment

      • patouch74
        Member
        • May 2014
        • 16

        #4
        Unfortunately blast2go is not free.

        So Ive downloaded command line HMMER with database Uniprot, the output is a blast like with a list of hits and the domain name.

        eg:

        E-value score bias E-value score bias exp N Sequence Description
        ------- ------ ----- ------- ------ ----- ---- -- -------- -----------
        + 6.6e-70 238.7 5.4 7.7e-70 238.5 5.4 1.0 1 sp|A1JMT1|MATP_YERE8 Macrodomain Ter protein OS=Yersinia en
        + 3.8e-69 236.3 4.1 4.2e-69 236.1 4.1 1.0 1 sp|Q7N603|MATP_PHOLL Macrodomain Ter protein OS=Photorhabdu

        But when I use HMMER on the website, I have access to accession number: do you know how can I get it with the command line HMMER ?

        Comment

        • WhatsOEver
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 215

          #5
          Hi patouch74,

          I can't help you with your HMMER problem, but I'd like to add something to B2G.

          Though there is a "pro"-version of Blast2go, the main features (blast, go mapping, annotation, interpro scan integration) are also available in the free version. Just go to http://www.blast2go.com/start-blast2go and start the JAVA web-start with at least 4Gb RAM (the more, the better).
          With your dataset I would also suggest to separate your fasta file into 4-6 smaller ones and run them independently in Blast2GO (I have had some problems with the program when analyzing bigger datasets). The separated runs can be easily combined with a build-in command afterwards.

          btw: You mentioned that your previous method took you "too long". What exactly is to long for you? The Blast-step in Blast2GO could in your case easily take up to 1 week to finish...

          Comment

          • patouch74
            Member
            • May 2014
            • 16

            #6
            Hi WhatsOEver,
            Yes, I week is too long for me

            If someone know something else, I'll be glad to hear it.

            Comment

            • juan.isaza
              Member
              • Aug 2010
              • 11

              #7
              Originally posted by patouch74 View Post
              Hi WhatsOEver,
              Yes, I week is too long for me

              If someone know something else, I'll be glad to hear it.
              you could do a local blast in xml format and then upload the xml file to Blast2GO and start with the annotation process there.

              There is a web server to metagenome analysis MG-RAST http://metagenomics.anl.gov , but I don't know if that server retrieve GO terms.
              Last edited by juan.isaza; 05-29-2014, 12:06 PM.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...