Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mandova
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 19

    need help with the MAQ installation

    the MAQ page wrote:
    Install Maq
    There are two ways to compile maq. The first way is to use the GNU building systems. Simply type:

    ./configure; make; make install
    you can compile and install maq. Three executables, `maq', `maq.pl' and `farm-run.pl', will be copied to /usr/local/bin by default.

    Alternatively, you could compile with:

    make -f Makefile.generic
    and manually copy the three executables to the destination directory. Modification to `Makefile.generic' is sometimes needed on different architectures.

    Maq is better compiled and used on a 64bit machine because it frequently uses 64bit integers. Compiling as a 32bit executable should work but the speed will be affected.


    Apparently I don't how to use a GNU building system, so I tried the "alternative" and it wouldn't work. I don't really understand this guide, and I suspect I'll need to install a GNU building system anyway?

    I'm so sorry if this sounds naive/familiar but...since "maq" is too short I couln't even get it work as a search key word...

    THANKS!!
  • raela
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 39

    #2
    What was the problem when you tried to configure? I just installed maq today and actually had to do a step before that.. instead, try:
    ./autogen.sh
    ./configure
    make
    If all of that goes off without a hitch, great! Move ahead to make install. If not, please post exactly what happens. If it's a lot of output, for example on configure, that fails.. run
    ./configure &> errors.txt
    Then find a place to upload errors.txt, or paste the comments into a pastebin (google pastebin and select one).

    Good luck.

    Comment

    • mandova
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 19

      #3
      Originally posted by raela View Post
      What was the problem when you tried to configure? I just installed maq today and actually had to do a step before that.. instead, try:
      ./autogen.sh
      ./configure
      make
      If all of that goes off without a hitch, great! Move ahead to make install. If not, please post exactly what happens. If it's a lot of output, for example on configure, that fails.. run
      ./configure &> errors.txt
      Then find a place to upload errors.txt, or paste the comments into a pastebin (google pastebin and select one).

      Good luck.
      THX!!
      well, all of the cmd lines above I tried gave out (translated) something like " '.' is not an internal or external command, nor executable program, nor batch file"....
      Am I missing some prerequisite, being the system I use or the compiling environment??

      Comment

      • raela
        Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 39

        #4
        Even if you try autogen.sh? Make sure you're in the same directory as it.. for example, if you just did tar zxvf maq.tar.gz, you then cd to maq/ (or whereever it went).. also, you might as well type 'ls' and make sure you see autogen.sh, then try ./autogen.sh

        Comment

        • mandova
          Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 19

          #5
          Originally posted by raela View Post
          Even if you try autogen.sh? Make sure you're in the same directory as it.. for example, if you just did tar zxvf maq.tar.gz, you then cd to maq/ (or whereever it went).. also, you might as well type 'ls' and make sure you see autogen.sh, then try ./autogen.sh
          I see the problem: I'm using windows vista...and I decompressed it with winrar...

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...