Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmartin
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 78

    #1

    running paired timepoints in cuffdiff

    I'm looking for some guidance with an RNAseq experiment with the following experimental design: 2 groups (infected and uninfected) and for each group we have 2 time points (pre- and post-treatment). I have 20 individuals divided up into those 2 groups (10 per group). And each of those individuals has data for each of the 2 time points.

    I would like to do 4 comparisons for our data:

    a) infected pre-treatment vs uninfected pre-treatment (independent samples)
    b) infected post-treatment vs uninfected post-treatment (independent samples)

    c) infected pre-treatment vs infected post-treatment (dependent, paired samples)
    d) uninfected pre-treatment vs uninfected post-treatment (dependent, paired samples)


    Comparisons 'a)' & 'b)' seem like a fairly straightforward cuffdiff run. I have a handle on how to approach those analyses. But for 'c)' & 'd)' I am not sure how to maintain the paired sets of samples per individual across each condition in such a way that maintains the pairing relationships correctly when comparing the 2 conditions.

    Looking through the cuffdiff manual, I do see that there is an argument that can tell cuffdiff our input is timepoints (-T). But I think that only compares samples in the same sequential order listed as condition A vs their mate in condition B. I don't think that does any kind of smart aggregation across each pairing to arrive at an overall differential expression between the 2 timepoints.

    Then I also see that there is an option to use a 'contrast file', in which I can define specific pairings of samples to compare between conditions A & B. That sounds like I could setup my paired timepoints to be compared to each other, but again it sounds like all this is doing is setting up specific pairs to generate results for. I don't think it does any special statistics that utilize all the sets of pairs to arrive at some aggregate result that overall compares my 2 timepoints.

    Can anyone advise me on how to properly use cuffdiff to perform the analyses I mentioned at the top of this post? Specifically help with 'c)' & 'd)' would be most appreciated.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...