Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmartin
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 78

    #1

    running paired timepoints in cuffdiff

    I'm looking for some guidance with an RNAseq experiment with the following experimental design: 2 groups (infected and uninfected) and for each group we have 2 time points (pre- and post-treatment). I have 20 individuals divided up into those 2 groups (10 per group). And each of those individuals has data for each of the 2 time points.

    I would like to do 4 comparisons for our data:

    a) infected pre-treatment vs uninfected pre-treatment (independent samples)
    b) infected post-treatment vs uninfected post-treatment (independent samples)

    c) infected pre-treatment vs infected post-treatment (dependent, paired samples)
    d) uninfected pre-treatment vs uninfected post-treatment (dependent, paired samples)


    Comparisons 'a)' & 'b)' seem like a fairly straightforward cuffdiff run. I have a handle on how to approach those analyses. But for 'c)' & 'd)' I am not sure how to maintain the paired sets of samples per individual across each condition in such a way that maintains the pairing relationships correctly when comparing the 2 conditions.

    Looking through the cuffdiff manual, I do see that there is an argument that can tell cuffdiff our input is timepoints (-T). But I think that only compares samples in the same sequential order listed as condition A vs their mate in condition B. I don't think that does any kind of smart aggregation across each pairing to arrive at an overall differential expression between the 2 timepoints.

    Then I also see that there is an option to use a 'contrast file', in which I can define specific pairings of samples to compare between conditions A & B. That sounds like I could setup my paired timepoints to be compared to each other, but again it sounds like all this is doing is setting up specific pairs to generate results for. I don't think it does any special statistics that utilize all the sets of pairs to arrive at some aggregate result that overall compares my 2 timepoints.

    Can anyone advise me on how to properly use cuffdiff to perform the analyses I mentioned at the top of this post? Specifically help with 'c)' & 'd)' would be most appreciated.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...