Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Daytwa
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 19

    #1

    coveragebed problem

    I am having trouble with the histogram option in coveragebed. I want to compare coverage of my uniquely aligned RNA-seq reads (list A) to a bed file of repeats (list B). When I run this comparison using the default command everything is fine:

    bedtools coverage -abam unique.bam -b Repeats.bed > unique_repeats.bed

    chrY 90737061 90737317 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 0 0 256 0
    chrY 90737327 90737430 + RLTR31D_MM LTR ERVK 0 0 103 0
    chrY 90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 93 106 301 0.3521595

    When I run this comparison with the -hist option I get some seemingly strange results:

    bedtools coverage -hist -abam unique.bam -b Repeats.bed > unique_repeats.bed

    90737061 90737317 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 0 256 256 1
    90737327 90737430 + RLTR31D_MM LTR ERVK 0 103 103 1
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 0 195 301 0.6478406
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 1 2 301 0.0066445
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 5 1 301 0.0033223
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 8 1 301 0.0033223
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 36 1 301 0.0033223
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 43 2 301 0.0066445
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 44 49 301 0.1627907
    90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 Satellite Satellite 49 50 301 0.166113

    At IPMPB_01 no reads in A overlap B but 100% of bases in B are listed as covered. This happens for all instances in which no reads in A overlap B (see 90737327 90737430 + RLTR31D_MM)

    When there is overlap the bedtools prints several more lines of information but I can't make sense of it. In example at 90737435 90737736 - IMPB_01 the first line says that one read covers two bases while on the next line 5 reads cover one base and so on. In fact several lines state that many reads cover only one base.

    Again this only happens when the histogram function is active. What am I missing here?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...