Hi all,
I've been looking at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) short read meta-data using the Bioconductor extracted SQLite data. (available from
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...tml/SRAdb.html)
One thing that is quite puzzling is out of All of the top-level studies why there are so few for 2013?
SQL Queries for the bioconductor data extracted from the SRA as of December 2013 show the following top-level study counts: -
2005|64
2006|38
2007|94
2008|269
2009|893
2010|2631
2011|4077
2012|5208
2013|724
One can see the increasing trend then fall-off from 2012. Wondering if anyone has any ideas why this might be?
Best regards,
Jamie
I've been looking at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) short read meta-data using the Bioconductor extracted SQLite data. (available from
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...tml/SRAdb.html)
One thing that is quite puzzling is out of All of the top-level studies why there are so few for 2013?
SQL Queries for the bioconductor data extracted from the SRA as of December 2013 show the following top-level study counts: -
2005|64
2006|38
2007|94
2008|269
2009|893
2010|2631
2011|4077
2012|5208
2013|724
One can see the increasing trend then fall-off from 2012. Wondering if anyone has any ideas why this might be?
Best regards,
Jamie
Comment