Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quantitative comparison between 2 IP ChIP-Seq samples, each with an input control.

    My initial question was how to quantitatively compare peaks from 2 ChIP samples, with accompanying inputs for each sample.
    macs2 bdgdiff allows one to take into account the inputs, but none of the other existing programs seem to allow this option.
    After doing research, the best option seems to just ignore the inputs, and compare the IP samples directly.

    According to the MMDiff authors:
    "Input correction is not necessary for differential peak calling as the local biases such as sequencing bias should affect all considered sample in the same way."
    Last edited by blancha; 06-13-2014, 06:05 PM. Reason: Deleted irrelevant post

  • #2
    I think that depends on what you are comparing. If you are comparing binding in different cell lines or in significantly different conditions, then you can indeed have sample-specific artifacts and ignoring the inputs will be the wrong thing to do.

    Shameless plug: Our MultiGPS software allows you to compare transcription factor binding across conditions in a principled way.

    Comment


    • #3
      One tool performing differential peak calling with replicates and supporting multiple input-DNA is THOR.

      Check here http://www.regulatory-genomics.org/THOR

      Comment


      • #4
        My favorite tool for this kind of analysis is Diffbind. It requires peaks called for each individual replicate using the respective inputs and then generates a list of peaks which are statistically differentially bound (I believe it uses DESeq for this, but you can also switch to use EdgeR if you prefer). The good news is that the tutorial is very user-friendly and in depth and actually uses ERa ChiP Seq data from different cell types as a tutorial.

        Hope this helps

        DiffBind R Package : https://bioconductor.org/packages/re.../DiffBind.html

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Advanced Methods for the Detection of Infectious Disease
          by seqadmin




          The recent pandemic caused worldwide health, economic, and social disruptions with its reverberations still felt today. A key takeaway from this event is the need for accurate and accessible tools for detecting and tracking infectious diseases. Timely identification is essential for early intervention, managing outbreaks, and preventing their spread. This article reviews several valuable tools employed in the detection and surveillance of infectious diseases.
          ...
          Yesterday, 01:15 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Investigating the Microbiome
          by seqadmin




          Microbiome research has led to the discovery of important connections to human and environmental health. Sequencing has become a core investigational tool in microbiome research, a subject that we covered during a recent webinar. Our expert speakers shared a number of advancements including improved experimental workflows, research involving transmission dynamics, and invaluable analysis resources. This article recaps their informative presentations, offering insights...
          11-09-2023, 07:02 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:12 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 11-22-2023, 09:29 AM
        1 response
        46 views
        0 likes
        Last Post VilliamPast  
        Started by seqadmin, 11-22-2023, 08:53 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 11-21-2023, 08:24 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X