Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adrian
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 90

    #1

    shorter time for building bowtie index

    Hi:
    I am not sure if this question has been asked before.

    I have 120 RNA-Seq fasta files. I am using tophat2 for aligning to human genome.

    I am queing this job on a 70 node cluster. I am using bowtie genome files downloaded from Illumina genome website.

    Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Sequence/Bowtie2Index/genome

    I see for every fastq file alignment, tophat building index file from genes.fa..

    It takes more than 30 minutes for every file.

    Can this time consuming process be avoided since we already have index files for bowtie.

    Following is my command line:

    tophat2 -p 16 \
    -G /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf \
    -o tpht \
    /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Sequence/Bowtie2Index/genome \

    myfile_1.fastq myfile_2.fastq

    Thanks
  • blancha
    Senior Member
    • May 2013
    • 367

    #2
    I don't know the answer to your question. Probably not.

    You can however get faster TopHat runs simply by adding the option --no-novel-juncs.

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #3
      Yes, in the most recent version(s) of tophat, you can pre-generate the indexes with the 'transcriptome-index' option:

      Comment

      • blancha
        Senior Member
        • May 2013
        • 367

        #4
        @gringer

        Very interesting, and useful. Thanks for the information.

        Comment

        • adrian
          Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 90

          #5
          Thank you so much! that is helpful.

          However when I use the following I don't see files - known.gff, known.fa, known.fa.tlst, known.fa.ver and the known.* Bowtie index files in the directory.

          following is my command:

          tophat2 -p 16 \
          -G /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf \
          -o tpht \
          /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Sequence/Bowtie2Index/genome \
          --transcriptome-index=known
          myfile_1.fastq myfile_2.fastq

          Is there something wrong. Where would the indexed known files will be deposited?
          thanks
          Adrian

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            To prepare transcriptome indexes you should not include the -o tpht or the sequence files. This is a special one time tophat run (Check the example in the link gringer included)

            Your command would be:
            Code:
            $ tophat2  \
            -G /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf \
            --transcriptome-index=IF_you_want_a_directory_name/known \
            /Refs/Homo_sapiens/Ensembl/GRCh37/Sequence/Bowtie2Index/genome
            This needs to be a non-threaded run so you have to omit the -p 16 as well.
            Last edited by GenoMax; 06-30-2014, 09:59 AM. Reason: Corrected error in the genome_base_name

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2




              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
              Today, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            67 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            47 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...