Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lv Ray
    Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 42

    Use bowtie2 to analysis DNA-reseq data

    Hi dear,
    I am going to deal with my big DNA-reseq data by bowtie2! I have finished index buliding , now I am preparing for mapping. But there're so many arguments to adjust! can I just use all the default ? but it seems not good.
    Can anybody tell me a complete solution or a paper about bowtie2-mapping pipeline? please Add your detail reasons for every argument, that is best!
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    Use the default options initially, because it's reasonable to assume that the people who wrote the program have a good idea about the behaviour of their program, and have set up the defaul options to work the best in a general situation. You're going to be splitting hairs (and racking up bioinformatics time) by playing around with bowtie options, so save that for when the reviewers of your Nature paper get back to you.

    Comment

    • Lv Ray
      Member
      • Jun 2014
      • 42

      #3
      gringer, thanks for your answer ! I will use the default options to try my data. However, I don't agree your second point that the default options is the best. Becuase I think they set so many options in order to adapt other situations.

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        Not the best in all situations, but they should be the best in most situations. To say that is not the case is implicitly saying that you understand the program better than the people who wrote it, which is a dangerous path to travel down.

        If you're interested in differential expression and fold-change differences of 1.1x, then fiddling with the options will probably have a big impact on your results. However if you're only fishing for the most obvious differences (i.e. "statistically significant"), and fold changes of 2x or more, then a few more reads here and there shouldn't affect the outcome of your analysis (and if it does, you probably shouldn't trust your answer).

        Comment

        • Lv Ray
          Member
          • Jun 2014
          • 42

          #5
          Thank you very much.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            Yesterday, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          52 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          110 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...