Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sewellh
    Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 13

    #1

    No Bowtie Alignments

    A former lab member assembled a number of contigs from Illumina reads using SPAdes. I have been trying to assess the depth of coverage using Bowtie2 when I noticed something interesting. I find that there are no Bowtie alignments (concordant or discordant) for the largest contig. Can anyone explain this?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Did you try taking (parts of) the large contig and blasting at NCBI to confirm if the data is from the same/similar species as you expect it to be? Are you mapping the same data back to the contigs?

    Comment

    • sewellh
      Member
      • Jun 2014
      • 13

      #3
      I am mapping the reads used to make the contigs back on to the contigs. I get alignments for all contigs except for the largest one. I have BLASTED the contig and it is what I expect.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Originally posted by sewellh View Post
        I am mapping the reads used to make the contigs back on to the contigs. I get alignments for all contigs except for the largest one. I have BLASTED the contig and it is what I expect.
        Not sure why you are not getting any hits to the largest contig. Have you redone the reference indexing to verify that the contig is included (and there were no errors with the index creation) and/or tried a different aligner?

        Comment

        • sewellh
          Member
          • Jun 2014
          • 13

          #5
          Yes, I redid it. Someone mentioned that SPAdes does error correcting on the reads prior to assembly which might result in differences, so I'm trying today to run the error correction on the raw reads before the Bowtie2 alignment.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            It still seems odd that it is affecting only that contig and nothing is aligning. How are you determining that nothing is aligning (by inspecting the BAM)?

            Comment

            • sewellh
              Member
              • Jun 2014
              • 13

              #7
              Yeah, by inspecting the SAM file.

              Comment

              • Brian Bushnell
                Super Moderator
                • Jan 2014
                • 2709

                #8
                1) Have you verified that all of the contigs have unique, correctly-formatted names?
                2) Does the contig look normal to you - high complexity, mainly defined bases, rather than e.g. a homopolymer or mostly-N sequence?
                3) Is it possible that this contig is a replicate of other contigs? Even though it's bigger, it could be fully covered by other contigs. So, do any other contigs map to it?
                4) Is it highly repetitive such that reads aligning to it might exceed the maximum number of allowed alignments?

                Comment

                • sewellh
                  Member
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 13

                  #9
                  Yes, the contigs have uniqe and correctly formatted names. But even when I try to just map the reads to the single large contig, I get no matches.

                  It doesn't look like this contig is a replicate of others but it does have a 3-4 copies of a ~500 nt fragment within itself. Does that mean that this contig was made incorrectly or that there is something else I should do? I would would expect that if I tried to align the raw reads just to single contig that I would get some alignments.

                  Update: Using the resulting fastq files from the Hammer error correcting, I still get no Bowtie alignments to that contig

                  Comment

                  • Brian Bushnell
                    Super Moderator
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 2709

                    #10
                    Sounds like a bug, but I don't know if it's in the assembler or aligner. I suggest trying a different aligner such as BBMap; and be sure to set the "ambig=all" flag so that reads without a unique best mapping site get mapped to all top-scoring sites.

                    Comment

                    • sewellh
                      Member
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 13

                      #11
                      Thanks so much for your help. I'll try out BBMap. If you are curious at all to look at the contigs, they're on JGI. The largest is:
                      >gi|589096183|gb|JARN01000011.1| Dehalococcoidia bacterium DscP2 WGS:JARN01:comHGAPfinal_Contig11_1.11, whole genome shotgun sequence

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                        ...
                        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                        ...
                        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                      0 responses
                      25 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                      0 responses
                      20 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                      0 responses
                      36 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                      0 responses
                      42 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...