Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sazz
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 28

    Variance - basic statistics

    Hello all,

    I'm sorry for my very naive and basic question, but I am trying to understand a couple of graphs: dispersion, M vs A etc, and I am a little confused about "variance" term.

    When you check the formula of variance it is the average of the squared differences from the mean. So can I say, genes with high FPKM values tend to have "high variance" and also they are more dispersed relative to low expressed genes? (But I guess, high variance in high FPKM is not a problem when you plot a negative binomial distribution graph to calculate the significance of differential expression) But this also sounds odd because without thinking the math part, I am tempted to say, low expressed genes generally are not significant in differential expression analyses due to the "variability" between FPKM values I guess, there is a misconception here (for me) as I think the variability in "percentage". Moreover, this variability defines the shape of the negative binomial distribution, if it will be more squeezed or spread, used for statistical testing, right? :/

    Sorry for asking about basic statistics. I would appreciate if one could explain briefly.

    Thanks!
  • csmatyi
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 25

    #2
    Hello everyone, I have a statistics question:

    I have a data set:

    1
    1
    1
    0
    1
    1
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0

    I want to measure how well the 1's accrue at the top of the list, that is, how well the 1's and 0's separate. The above list should have a high value compoared to a random one:

    1
    0
    1
    0
    1
    0
    1
    0
    ...

    What kind of test do I need for this?

    Thanks!

    Comment

    • TiborNagy
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 329

      #3
      Hi sazz!

      Variance in gene expression is not depends on FPKM. It is just a statistical measure of the replicates.

      csmatyi:

      I think you need khi-square test.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...