Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Genomics101
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 60

    Best programs/methods for looking at mapped coverage? (Mapping whole genome data)

    Greetings.

    I'm interested in looking, in detail, at the mapped coverage for NGS short read data onto a reference, using whole genome data. I'd like a good way to examine and quantify the coverage along a chromosome and compare this coverage among samples to look for areas with usually high- and low-coverage, and to see if these high- and low-coverage areas are common among samples. I know how to get basic mapped read data using SAMtools, and I can look at the data visually using Atermis, but I don't know how to do anything more sophisticated.

    Any help is much appreciated, cheers!
  • Wallysb01
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 286

    #2
    I suppose what you might be looking for is IGV, it does a very nice job of displaying coverage coming from an aligned bam file. It can show you things like SNPs/indels in your reads too.

    Comment

    • westerman
      Rick Westerman
      • Jun 2008
      • 1104

      #3
      Since Genomics101 can already look at the data visually via Artemis (ACT) I am not sure if IGV would add much to his knowledge.

      I suggest exploring the use of the '-D' (and required '-u/-g') option in 'samtools mpileup'. Piped to bcftools that should give you the depth of coverage for each sample at each base. A bit of parsing into spreadsheet form and you could do further manipulations in Excel, et.al.

      Comment

      • kokonech
        Curious Character
        • Sep 2010
        • 13

        #4
        You should check out QualiMap, which is useful to get an overview of BAM file:


        It computes plenty of useful quality metrics such as mean and std coverage, coverage per chromosome and others. Additionally it produces a number of plots including coverage histogram and coverage across reference. By request it can output per-base coverage.

        Here is an example report:

        Comment

        • rhinoceros
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 372

          #5
          You could:

          1. Map your reads to the reference with bwa
          2. Turn the sam file into a bam file with samtools
          3. Visualize with tablet
          savetherhino.org

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            It appears that Genomics101 is interested in getting quantitative/qualitative differential coverage data for samples (not just a visual inspection). Trying to think if there is anything available that can do this without custom code.

            Comment

            • westerman
              Rick Westerman
              • Jun 2008
              • 1104

              #7
              I suspect some custom code will have to be written but the code, aside from samtools and bcf, should be all unix tools. I suspect that 'grep,' 'cut' and perhaps 'paste' will be the tools required. Nothing that a even a rookie bioinformatics person should find difficult. While a bit awkward I think that the following will tease out the depths into a TSV file.

              Code:
              # Get chromosome positions and per-sample coverage (depth)
              
              samtools mpileup -D -u file1.sorted.bam file2.sorted.bam file3.sorted.bam | bcftools view - | grep -v '#' | cut -f 1,2,10-12 > bam.tmp
              
              # Just extract chromosome positions
              cut -f 1,2 bam.tmp > position.tmp
              
              # Get the depth part of the samples
              for i in `seq 3 5`
                do 
                cut -f $i bam.tmp | cut -f 2 -d ':' > depth_$i.tmp
              done
              
              # Put it together into a spreadsheet
              paste position.tmp depth_*.tmp > results.tsv
              The results I got on my test file (and I expect high coverage from this experiment) look like:

              Code:
              S1      1       1802    1264    2665
              S1      2       1811    1267    2666
              S1      3       1812    1267    2667
              S1      4       1812    1267    2668
              S1      5       1812    1268    2668
              S1      6       1811    1266    2661
              S1      7       1812    1267    2667
              S1      8       1811    1265    2665
              S1      9       1811    1266    2669
              S1      10      1810    1263    2662
              Last edited by westerman; 07-22-2014, 09:48 AM. Reason: Ah, first try did not work. Need a 'for' (bash). Remember you are getting what you pay for. :-)

              Comment

              • Matt Kearse
                Member
                • Mar 2014
                • 20

                #8
                Geneious (which is commercial software) has nice coverage visualization. You can also run the high/low coverage finder on each sample to annotate regions of high/low coverage. Then run the compare annotations tool to compare the results between samples which will annotate regions in one sample that have high/low coverage not present in other samples. The video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGmxjK3f_4 demonstrates some of this starting from around 30 seconds into it.

                Comment

                • wokai001
                  Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20

                  #9
                  Altough I did not intent do cover whole chromosomes, you may have a look at my 'rbamtools' package.
                  There is a alignDepth function with which you can calculate coverage values as numerical values and may plot the values (There's a new plot function in the next release...)

                  Comment

                  • jwfoley
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 183

                    #10
                    What you're describing is basically the same problem as ChIP-seq peak calling from multiple samples. I wrote a program called UniPeak that does this very straightforwardly (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-720). It uses Epanechnikov kernel smoothing rather than base coverage, but if you think about it, coverage is mathematically equivalent to kernel smoothing with a rectangular kernel. So you could try it with Epanechnikov smoothing (if anything this might actually give you better results), or change the kernel function to a rectangle and recompile (PM me if you need help with that).

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                      by SEQadmin2


                      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                      ...
                      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                      ...
                      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:41 AM
                    0 responses
                    10 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
                    0 responses
                    23 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                    0 responses
                    36 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                    0 responses
                    45 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...