Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • finfin
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    Hi finfin, the first messages that you are getting, are they warnings or errors?
    When you changed the versions, you mention it is getting stuck in estimateDispersions, what version of DEXSeq are you using?

    Hi Richard, when doing this:
    Code:
    > a <- fitDispersionFunction()
    Warning message:
    'fitDispersionFunction' is deprecated.
    Use 'estimateDispersions' instead.
    See help("Deprecated") 
    > a
    [1] "'fitDispersionFunction' is deprecated.\nUse 'estimateDispersions' instead.\nSee help(\"Deprecated\")"
    Your DEXSeqDataSet object seems to be substituted for a character vector and thats the reason "testForDEU" is failing, does not seem like a nice behaviour of a deprecated function... will check this!

    For both, you seem to be running DEXSeq using a single core. I would recommend using multiple cores to speed up the computations (see the parameter BPPARAM of both estimateDispersions and testForDEU). A set of 2 conditions, 3 replicates each should take less than 20 minutes using 5 cores.

    Alejandro
    Hi Alejandro, they are warnings.

    I tried a clean environment and re-installed everything, now I got the results.
    I think somehow the previous environment still used a very old version.

    Thank you very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    Hi finfin, the first messages that you are getting, are they warnings or errors?
    When you changed the versions, you mention it is getting stuck in estimateDispersions, what version of DEXSeq are you using?

    Hi Richard, when doing this:
    Code:
    > a <- fitDispersionFunction()
    Warning message:
    'fitDispersionFunction' is deprecated.
    Use 'estimateDispersions' instead.
    See help("Deprecated") 
    > a
    [1] "'fitDispersionFunction' is deprecated.\nUse 'estimateDispersions' instead.\nSee help(\"Deprecated\")"
    Your DEXSeqDataSet object seems to be substituted for a character vector and thats the reason "testForDEU" is failing, does not seem like a nice behaviour of a deprecated function... will check this!

    For both, you seem to be running DEXSeq using a single core. I would recommend using multiple cores to speed up the computations (see the parameter BPPARAM of both estimateDispersions and testForDEU). A set of 2 conditions, 3 replicates each should take less than 20 minutes using 5 cores.

    Alejandro

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    Now it's giving me this ...
    > ecs <- estimateSizeFactors(dxd)
    > ecs <- estimateDispersions(ecs, fitType="local" )
    using supplied model matrix
    using supplied model matrix
    > ecs <- fitDispersionFunction(ecs)
    Warning message:
    'fitDispersionFunction' is deprecated.
    Use 'estimateDispersions' instead.
    See help("Deprecated")
    > ecs <- testForDEU(ecs)
    Error in (function (classes, fdef, mtable) :
    unable to find an inherited method for function 'sizeFactors' for signature '"character"'
    Calls: testForDEU -> sizeFactors -> <Anonymous>
    Execution halted



    rrrrghhh

    Leave a comment:


  • finfin
    replied
    Originally posted by Richard Finney View Post
    estimateDispersionFit doesn't appear to be part of DexSeq

    I'm not sure what package it's part of.
    I checked the source code, and found in R/methods.R, where defines all the functions. In function estimateDispersions.DEXSeqDataSet<-function(fitType=c("parametric", "local","mean"))
    But this parameter could not be modified in the function call.
    I'm trying to set it to "local" or "mean" only as you suggested. Since I am not quite familiar with R, I am still trying to re-package and install it so that I could test how it goes.

    Thank you very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    estimateDispersionFit doesn't appear to be part of DexSeq

    I'm not sure what package it's part of.

    Leave a comment:


  • finfin
    replied
    Originally posted by Richard Finney View Post
    Yeah, my script ran for a several days before printing this message....

    In estimateDispersionsFit(object, fitType = fitType, quiet = quiet) :
    the parametric fit of dispersion estimates over the mean of counts
    failed, which occurs when the trend is not well captured by the
    function y = a/x + b. A local regression fit is automatically performed,
    and the analysis can continue. You can specify fitType='local' or 'mean'
    to avoid this message if re-running the same data.
    When using local regression fit, the user should examine plotDispEsts(dds)
    to make sure the fitted line is not sharply curving up or down based on
    the position of individual points.
    Did you find this function in source code?

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    Yeah, my script ran for a several days before printing this message....

    In estimateDispersionsFit(object, fitType = fitType, quiet = quiet) :
    the parametric fit of dispersion estimates over the mean of counts
    failed, which occurs when the trend is not well captured by the
    function y = a/x + b. A local regression fit is automatically performed,
    and the analysis can continue. You can specify fitType='local' or 'mean'
    to avoid this message if re-running the same data.
    When using local regression fit, the user should examine plotDispEsts(dds)
    to make sure the fitted line is not sharply curving up or down based on
    the position of individual points.

    Leave a comment:


  • finfin
    replied
    Originally posted by Richard Finney View Post
    I'm going to put some print statements in the source and try and figure it out.
    I don't even get a message. it just spins for days.

    Last thing I see is "using supplied model matrix".
    I did not get any error message before it threw out the ones above.

    Did you find anything?

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    I'm going to put some print statements in the source and try and figure it out.
    I don't even get a message. it just spins for days.

    Last thing I see is "using supplied model matrix".
    Last edited by Richard Finney; 07-25-2014, 01:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • finfin
    replied
    Originally posted by Richard Finney View Post
    I'm getting locked up on estimateDispersions(), too.
    Just zones out, never returns.

    did you provide a flatenedfile argument to an earlier call (like the
    DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq() function ) ???

    I generated the flatten exon annotation file earlier by using the python script directly.
    The commands I used were:

    exons<-read.table("sampleInfo",header=T,row.names=1)
    exonCount<-read.HTSeqCounts(file.path(exons$countFile),exons,"hg19.dexseq.gff")
    exonCount<-estimateSizeFactors(exonCount)
    exonCount<-estimateDispersions(exonCount) #It stuck here

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    I'm getting locked up on estimateDispersions(), too.
    Just zones out, never returns.

    did you provide a flatenedfile argument to an earlier call (like the
    DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq() function ) ???

    Leave a comment:


  • finfin
    started a topic DEXSeq estimatedispersion error

    DEXSeq estimatedispersion error

    Added on 1st Aug: solved. Thank you everyone.

    I was trying DEXSeq and I stuck at the dispersion estimation step.
    I got exactly the same error as described in:
    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


    The process stuck there for hours and then threw out error messages as following:

    1: In .local(object, ...) :
    Exons with less than 11 counts will be discarded. For more details read the documentation, parameter minCount
    2: In .local(object, ...) :
    Genes with more than 70 testable exons will be kicked out of the analysis. For more details read the documentation, parameter maxExon
    3: In .local(object, ...) :
    Failed to set up model frames for genes ENSG (a bunch of gene names here)

    I read the previous discussion where people mentioned by upgrade to Version 1.2.1 the problem will be solved. However, I downloaded the package this week so it is the newest version.

    If anyone knows how to solve this problem, please kindly reply. I do appreciate it.

    I have 3 replicates for both treatment and control, and the session information is attached below.



    > sessionInfo()
    R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)
    Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)

    locale:
    [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
    [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
    [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
    [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C
    [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
    [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C

    attached base packages:
    [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
    [7] base

    other attached packages:
    [1] pasilla_0.2.13 DESeq_1.8.3 locfit_1.5-9.1
    [4] DEXSeq_1.2.1 Biobase_2.16.0 BiocGenerics_0.2.0

    loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
    [1] annotate_1.34.1 AnnotationDbi_1.18.4
    [3] biomaRt_2.12.0 DBI_0.2-7
    [5] genefilter_1.38.0 geneplotter_1.34.0
    [7] grid_2.15.0 hwriter_1.3
    [9] IRanges_1.14.4 lattice_0.20-6
    [11] plyr_1.8 RColorBrewer_1.0-5
    [13] RCurl_1.91-0 RSQLite_0.11.4
    [15] splines_2.15.0 statmod_1.4.20
    [17] stats4_2.15.0 stringr_0.5
    [19] survival_2.36-12 tools_2.15.0
    [21] XML_3.93-0 xtable_1.7-3
    Last edited by finfin; 08-01-2014, 06:20 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...