Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fernas
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 74

    Standard Processing Steps for RNASeq and Bisulfite-Seq raw data

    Hi all,

    I have the raw mRNA-Seq/Bisulfite-Seq data for multiple cell types (in sra format). I want to know if there is a research article or website where I can find the standard pre-processing steps for both types of data. For example:
    1) quality based filtering
    2) read trimming
    3) coverage threshold
    4) mapping criteria (multiple mapping issue,...etc)
    ...etc
  • fkrueger
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 627

    #2
    We are processing our internal data pretty much according to this protocol.

    Comment

    • Fernas
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 74

      #3
      Thank you very much indeed @fkrugeger. It is very useful documentation. I am wondering if there is something similar to this for RNA-Seq?

      Regarding your documentation, I read it and I have couple of questions:

      1) How can we cacluate the methylation proportion: for example, I found that some research articles calculated methylation proportions as (methylated calls / (methylated calls + unmethylated calls)). How can I calculate this?

      2) Filtering for high read coverage: I am wondering if we have different libraries, shall we set the coverage threshold to be the same for all replicates/libraries? or it depends on the library size? what threshold you used?

      3) Pool replicates: If I have 4 libraries represent 4 different technical or biological replicates of the same cell type. The document did not discuss how can I combine the replicates. Any idea about that?

      4) Did you apply any normalization/re-scale methods to remove the sequencing bias between libraries and/or cell types?

      Comment

      • peromhc
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 108

        #5
        For read trimming in RNAseq, please see: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journ...00013/abstract

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...