I have just put up on our website the first release of an application we have developed to perform QC checks on high throughput sequence data.
FastQC runs a series of tests and will flag up and potential problems with your data.
The program can either be run as an interactive GUI application or it can run in an unattended offline mode where it generates HTML versions of its reports.
We've been using this on some of our data for a few weeks and have found it really useful for looking at aspects of your data which the standard instrument QC checks may miss.
FastQC is free software under the GPLv3. You can download it from:
http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
..where there is also a sample report which you can look at.
[Please note that the rather aggressive BBSRC cache may show you old versions of some pages - if you can't see FastQC on some of our pages please press shift+refresh in your browser to force an update which bypasses the cache].
We are keen to get feedback from other sites - in particular we'd like to know:
I hope this proves useful to some people here.
Simon.
FastQC runs a series of tests and will flag up and potential problems with your data.
The program can either be run as an interactive GUI application or it can run in an unattended offline mode where it generates HTML versions of its reports.
We've been using this on some of our data for a few weeks and have found it really useful for looking at aspects of your data which the standard instrument QC checks may miss.
FastQC is free software under the GPLv3. You can download it from:
http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
..where there is also a sample report which you can look at.
[Please note that the rather aggressive BBSRC cache may show you old versions of some pages - if you can't see FastQC on some of our pages please press shift+refresh in your browser to force an update which bypasses the cache].
We are keen to get feedback from other sites - in particular we'd like to know:
- Are there other tests you think would be useful
- Are the criteria we're using to warn about potentially bad data any good (and can you suggest improvements)
I hope this proves useful to some people here.
Simon.
Comment