I'm working with a tetraploid soybean species, and I want to determine which DNA-seq reads exist on only one of the two diploid progenitor genomes. I have two consensus fasta files (one for each diploid genome) and want to map reads to them to determine which reads map to only one genome based on mapping scores. I already have a pipeline for accomplishing this, but I'm running into a problem. One consensus file has 30 million more Ns than the other. Reads that should map equally to both species favor one because it has fewer Ns, and therefore a higher mapping score. Is there a way to replace A/C/G/T's in one consensus file with an N where the other consensus file has an N? The consensus sequences were made by mapping RNA-seq and DNA-seq reads to the Glycine max genome, so they should be comparable.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
I'm not aware of a ready-made tool to do this job but it sounds like something you could do with Perl. I'm sure there are online tutorials you could use otherwise I found this book useful when first starting (http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596000806.do)
Are both consensus sequences the same length for each chromosome/scaffold? Doesn't really matter if they aren't, would just make the perl script to do this job easier.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Genome Sequencing Reveals Large, Repeat-Rich DNA in Trapdoor Spider Named for Stephen Colbert
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
Comment