Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kjaja
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 58

    analyzing RNA seq

    Hi All,

    I have RNA sequencing data (expression data) for a control sample and cases (with disease) and at multiple time points but no replicates of. any ideas on how to analyze this type of data?

    thanks
  • Richard Finney
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 701

    #2
    check out Deseq2 and Dexseq.

    Comment

    • crazyhottommy
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 187

      #3
      No replicates is a bad experimental design.
      Next maSigPro: updating maSigPro Bioconductor
      package for RNA-seq time series

      and here http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2013/203681/

      Comment

      • mbblack
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 245

        #4
        No replicates means you have no ability to use parametric statistics to assess significance (other than using permutations or some other iterative approach to simulate=guestimate variance).

        You should have a look at some alternative analysis. Two that come to mind is a simple Rank Product analysis of fold change lists (which you can do in R or in a simple Excel spreadsheet for that matter). There is also GFOLD (http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals...8/21/2782.long ) which uses a baseyian posterior probablity estimate of the distribution of fold changes to derive statistics and ranking. GFOLD will be helped by replicates (as they allow for a more robust estimate of the posterior probability distribution) but is valid without them (the only assumption then is that read count for any gene is poisson distributed).

        GFOLD is available in BioConductor.
        Last edited by mbblack; 07-31-2014, 06:41 AM.
        Michael Black, Ph.D.
        ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...