Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • travelk
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 20

    Removing contaminating reads

    Hey all,

    I have a very basic question that I just cannot seem to find a straight answer to despite scouring Google and SEQanswers.

    When I ran my dataset through Fastq_screen I discovered I have E. coli contamination. I ran my files in Tophat2 against the E.coli genome and determined that about 5% of my reads positively map to E. coli.

    I would like to remove these reads but I cannot figure out how.

    Most forum posts suggest to remove them but do not specify the exact method to do that. My initial thought was to take my unmapped.bam file from my E.coli alignment and use that as my "clean" data but it means converting the data back to fastq in paired reads format and adding various processing steps so I'm not really sure what is left in that file. Naturally, I'd like to lose as little data as possible.

    Is there a simple way to just take my original file fastq file, extract the E.coli+ reads and have a clean data set?

    Or alternatively, does having a contamination like that not really matter because they won't map to the mouse genome anyway?

    Obviously I'm pretty new to this and teaching myself so any advice, however simple it may seem, is much appreciated.

    Thanks for your help!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Just align to the E coli genome with bowtie2, which can be told to write unmapped reads in fastq format. You can then directly align the resulting fastq files.

    Comment

    • a.kmg
      Member
      • Aug 2014
      • 15

      #3
      You can run Bowtie2 with your fastq file on E.coli to suppress reads corresponding to E.coli :

      bowtie2 -U rawFastq -p nbproc --un fasqtFileWithoutEcoli indexEcoli -S ecoli_reads.sam
      This command treats the raw fastq file, creating a new fastq containing not E.coli reads (--un = unmapped reads) and recovering reads aligned on E. coli in a sam file (-S option). Delete -S option if you do not want to get the E.coli reads.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        BBMap example (remain in the same directory or adjust paths accordingly). Will work on PC/Mac/*nix.

        1. Get Ecoli genome fasta file.

        2. Build an index for Ecoli genome using BBMap.

        Code:
        $ bbmap.sh ref=./E_coli_genome.fa
        3. Align against the Ecoli genome index saving reads that don't align to a new file (these are the reads you want, the outu file below)

        Code:
        $ bbmap.sh in=your_fastq_file path=./ outm=E_coli_reads.fastq outu=reads_you_want.fastq qin=33

        Comment

        • travelk
          Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 20

          #5
          Thank you! This totally did the trick. I processed the files and then reran them through fastq_screen and all the E.coli reads were gone.

          And thank you a.kmg and GenoMax for your clear step by step instructions.

          I ended up using bowtie2 because that it what I've been working with so far. I initially got an error message but realized I was missing the -x in the command line. So, in the end I used:

          bowtie2 -U raw.fastq -p nbproc --un FileWithoutEcoli.fastq -x indexEcoli -S ecoli_reads.sam

          Comment

          • nareshvasani
            Member
            • Apr 2013
            • 57

            #6
            Hi fellow,

            I am trying to find rRNA gene from my input file:

            Step1: Create Index

            #bowtie2-build rRNA.fasta rRNA.index

            Step 2: Align to rRNA index inorder to get rRNA free fastq file.

            #bowtie2-align -p 2 -k 1 -q -U /filter_clean.fastq --un fasqFileWithoutrRNA -x rRNA.index

            When I run second step, it comes with error saying:

            " bowtie2-align: option '--un' is ambiguous; possibilities: '--ungapped' '--unpaired' "

            So I replace --un with --unpaired, But it is not working.

            Can anyone please shed some light on this.

            I would really appreciate your help.

            Thanks,
            Naresh

            Comment

            • jpnm
              Junior Member
              • May 2013
              • 1

              #7
              As far as I know "--un" is not an option of bowtie2-align...but only of bowtie2!

              So if you run, it should work fine!

              bowtie2 -p 2 -k 1 -q -U /filter_clean.fastq --un fasqFileWithoutrRNA -x rRNA.index

              I hope it helps!

              Comment

              • nareshvasani
                Member
                • Apr 2013
                • 57

                #8
                Originally posted by jpnm View Post
                As far as I know "--un" is not an option of bowtie2-align...but only of bowtie2!

                So if you run, it should work fine!

                bowtie2 -p 2 -k 1 -q -U /filter_clean.fastq --un fasqFileWithoutrRNA -x rRNA.index

                I hope it helps!
                Hi jpnm,

                Thanks for your input, I am trying you suggestion. Will keep you posted.


                Naresh

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                16 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                49 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                108 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                125 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...