Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lucasmiguel
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 9

    Expressed genes vs Expressed transcripts

    I analyzed differential gene expression using Cuffdiff, but the number of genes expressed is smaller than transcripts expressed. Anyone can explain this?

    In my mind, the number of transcripts should be bigger.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    You just wrote that the number of transcripts is bigger, which is what you expect. Did you mean that the number of genes expressed is larger than the number of transcripts? If so, how are you defining expressed? I'm guessing that you're setting a threshold and then noticing that fewer transcripts are expressed since a given gene's signal can get diluted over multiple transcripts (possibly causing all of them to fall below threshold even though the gene as a whole is above threshold).

    Comment

    • lucasmiguel
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 9

      #3
      I defined that one gene is DE if he has FDR <= 0.05 (5%) and the same threshold for transcripts. It's wrong?

      And yes, i meant larger than.

      Thanks for replying, dpryan.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Well expressed is very different from DE. It's not surprising to find fewer DE transcripts for the reasons I mentioned in my first post (I don't remember if cuffdiff looks at genes with only 1 transcript in the transcript output, but if not then that'd further decrease things).

        Comment

        • lucasmiguel
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2014
          • 9

          #5
          Ok. Thanks dpryan, helped a lot.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...