Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ronton
    Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 34

    Help with FastQC interpretation

    I am wondering if anyone can help provide possible explanations for my FastQC results, specifically the red Xs for Adapter Content and Kmer Content. These were .fastq.gz files straight from an Illumina HiSeq 2500, 100bp paired end reads. 'Casava FastQ Files' filter was used to group multiple files for the single sample.

    Under Adapter Content, the Illumina Universal Adapter line comes up around 42bp with a value of 10% at 84bp. For Kmer Content, the curves begin at 73bp and reach a value of 6 by 90bp.

    Is this bad? Should I trim adapters for example with BBDuk and run FastQC again? Any help is appreciated, thank you.
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    This is not bad. Both of those indicators are most likely result of sequencing library fragments with inserts shorter than 100 bp, so part of adapters also have been sequenced. I would suspect that qualitry scores also dropping toward ends more than usuall. Trimming adpters should fix both issues.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    102 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    124 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...