Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jayakumar S
    Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 36

    GBS vs RAD

    Hello,
    We are planning to study the diversity of a species and for the same we are in a confusion whether to go for RAD or GBS?.
    In which technique, we will get more SNPs genotyped?.
    What will be the depth in each?.
    Kindly suggest.

    Thanks
    Jayakumar S
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Number of SNPs that can be genotyped is not dependent on the techniques. To detect SNPs firstly they must be present in genomes and that will be dependent on divergence of samples. Secondly, SNP detection is an statistical process and there is always some uncertainty about its existence or detection. With more stringent criteria number of detected SNPs decreases.

    RAD or GBS (and many of their derivatives) essentially are reducing representation of genomic regions by their distance from one or two restriction recognition site(s). Depth or coverage will be influenced by two factors. One is proportion of genome that is represented in library (tag number) and second is number of reads obtained for each sample. Generally, a method such as ddRAD that involves a size selection step would be desirable to tune number of tags and sequencing requirements to obtain a suitable depth.

    Comment

    • Jayakumar S
      Member
      • Sep 2013
      • 36

      #3
      Hi,
      I understand that the number of SNPs that can be genotyped is not dependent on the techniques.
      For the specified number of SNPs identified at 20X, in which technique, we will get more number of SNPs genotyped?.
      Please correct, if I am wrong.

      Thanks
      Jayakumar S

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Generally %5 of RAD-tags are polymorphic, so to obtain 1k SNP one needs 20k tags common to all samples if missing genotypes are undesirable. Number of reads/sample will be: number of tags x depth x2. Tag number resulting from any restriction enzyme alone or in combination can be estimated by in silico analysis of species or a close relative genome. For specis with no reference genome it has to be estimated emperically.

        Comment

        • Jayakumar S
          Member
          • Sep 2013
          • 36

          #5
          Thank you for the information.
          Can you please suggest whether ddRAD or GBS will be better to study the diversity in livestock?.

          Thanks
          Jayakumar S

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            I would suggest searching literature for GBS on the animal that you are going to study and that may give some ideas for your project. If you are going to outsource library prep you may get specific advice for your project from service providers. If you want to prepare libraries in house, I would suggest ddRAD with 90 bp window for size-selection and multiplexing 96 samples for one HiSeq lane. After sequencing and data analysis to increase coverage (if it is lower than desired) you can sequence the same library gain. As I have mentioned before in silico analysis of a related reference genome also would be useful.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...