Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jayakumar S
    Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 36

    #1

    GBS vs RAD

    Hello,
    We are planning to study the diversity of a species and for the same we are in a confusion whether to go for RAD or GBS?.
    In which technique, we will get more SNPs genotyped?.
    What will be the depth in each?.
    Kindly suggest.

    Thanks
    Jayakumar S
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Number of SNPs that can be genotyped is not dependent on the techniques. To detect SNPs firstly they must be present in genomes and that will be dependent on divergence of samples. Secondly, SNP detection is an statistical process and there is always some uncertainty about its existence or detection. With more stringent criteria number of detected SNPs decreases.

    RAD or GBS (and many of their derivatives) essentially are reducing representation of genomic regions by their distance from one or two restriction recognition site(s). Depth or coverage will be influenced by two factors. One is proportion of genome that is represented in library (tag number) and second is number of reads obtained for each sample. Generally, a method such as ddRAD that involves a size selection step would be desirable to tune number of tags and sequencing requirements to obtain a suitable depth.

    Comment

    • Jayakumar S
      Member
      • Sep 2013
      • 36

      #3
      Hi,
      I understand that the number of SNPs that can be genotyped is not dependent on the techniques.
      For the specified number of SNPs identified at 20X, in which technique, we will get more number of SNPs genotyped?.
      Please correct, if I am wrong.

      Thanks
      Jayakumar S

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Generally %5 of RAD-tags are polymorphic, so to obtain 1k SNP one needs 20k tags common to all samples if missing genotypes are undesirable. Number of reads/sample will be: number of tags x depth x2. Tag number resulting from any restriction enzyme alone or in combination can be estimated by in silico analysis of species or a close relative genome. For specis with no reference genome it has to be estimated emperically.

        Comment

        • Jayakumar S
          Member
          • Sep 2013
          • 36

          #5
          Thank you for the information.
          Can you please suggest whether ddRAD or GBS will be better to study the diversity in livestock?.

          Thanks
          Jayakumar S

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            I would suggest searching literature for GBS on the animal that you are going to study and that may give some ideas for your project. If you are going to outsource library prep you may get specific advice for your project from service providers. If you want to prepare libraries in house, I would suggest ddRAD with 90 bp window for size-selection and multiplexing 96 samples for one HiSeq lane. After sequencing and data analysis to increase coverage (if it is lower than desired) you can sequence the same library gain. As I have mentioned before in silico analysis of a related reference genome also would be useful.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...