Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bongbimit
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 29

    iprlookup parameter in interproscan5 ?!

    Hi all,
    I have a question about 3 parameters in interproscan5: -goterms, -iprlookup and --pathways. I run 2 command line, one with 3 parameters and other without. But after check result xml file, i didn't saw anythings different between 2 file xml results.
    So what is actually meaning of 3 parameters and their application in annotation by interproscan5?

    Thank you.
  • bastianwur
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 98

    #2
    If you run with -iprlookup you get the precomputed results.
    They should contain already the goterms and pathways. So adding both parameters to that will not give any additional results, in case all of your proteins have been processed before.
    In case most of your proteins are new, then you need the both other parameters.

    Comment

    • oussamabadada
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2015
      • 1

      #3
      Hi i have a question in the same direction i'm trying to run a scan on big fasta file and just want to use the -goterms and -pa option and they implies he -iprlookup option is this command correct ?
      interproscan.sh -t n -appl Pfam,Hamap,PANTHER,PRINTS,SUPERFAMILY -pa -goterms -iprlookup -i Olea_europaea.gene.final.cds.fa

      thx in advance

      Comment

      • bastianwur
        Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 98

        #4
        Sorry for the late answer, not regularly here.
        the iprlookup option will just look up if your protein has already been previously calculated at the EBI, and will return the results, which will also include the pathways and goterms.
        It doesn't change any other behaviour of the program.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...