Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fznajar
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 35

    #1

    annotating large number of eukaryotic contigs

    What is the best way to annotate large number of contains from a eukaryote. BlastX is going to take a long time. I was wondering if FgeneSH will be a better first step?
  • WhatsOEver
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 215

    #2
    What is it exactly that you want to do?
    It sounds like you want to gene prediction and annotation in one run which doesn't work.

    Do gene prediction first (here is a small list of programs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ction_software). For eukaryotes I prefer augustus or genemark.

    For gene annotation you can use something like Blast2GO which is very easy to use. But it takes some time...

    Comment

    • lkral
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 27

      #3
      Fgenesh worked very well for my needs as a first step to identify potential genes. To actually annotate, fgenesh++ would be needed but I have not been able to try that out with my scaffolds (anyone have any experience with this program?) My workflow is to import the fgenesh results into webapollo and then do the rest of the annotation steps manually:

      Last edited by lkral; 10-17-2014, 07:57 AM.

      Comment

      • fznajar
        Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 35

        #4
        I was worried that since its eukaryote, there would be few full length genes on each contig.

        appreciate both of you.

        Best,

        Comment

        • lkral
          Member
          • May 2011
          • 27

          #5
          Depends how long the contigs are. It is likely that even long contigs (over 10 Kb) will contain only partial genes. But as long as you are not trying to carry out whole genome comparisons you can assemble whole genes of interest from the partial genes in these contigs (as long as these are single copy genes).

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...