I don't know rpy2-bioconductor - and don't see the benefit either.
I've been using R and bioconductor via rpy2 for years now - it's a solid combo, especially in combination with pandas.
-
is rpy2-bioconductor-extensions good? is it still up to date?
My primary scripting language is python. And I start to use R packages more often, but still prefers working in python.
I start to look into rpy2, also noticed rpy2-bioconductor-extensions. But rpy2-bioconductor-extensions was last updated on 2010. Is it still up-to-date with current bioconductor releases? what's it can do while basic rpy2 cannot do? Is it better off just use pure R?
I'd like to listen to your opinions.
Thanks!
-
NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...Today, 06:46 AM -
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
Leave a comment: