Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cggj
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 5

    #1

    BWA alignments and time

    Hi all,

    I am aligning Illumina 75bp paired-end reads with BWA. I did this before and it worked just fine. Now I've been trying to align a new reads file and it works fine while I keep monitoring it, but it is the second time that it just stops and judging by the size of the file generated it didn't finish processing all the reads, and I can stay here forever making sure that it keeps running...

    So, I have a few questions... 1. In average how long does BWA take to align let's say 1,000,000 75bp reads and 2. Does this look like a software problem or my server is killing the process at some point?

    Thank you
  • drio
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 323

    #2
    Is the bwa process doing anything CPU? I/O?

    It should not take more than 5/10min.
    -drd

    Comment

    • cggj
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 5

      #3
      Yes, I can see it processing and its running in the background. If I log out and in again and check the processes it keeps running but eventually it stops without finishing... It is taking right now ~15 mins for every 250,000 reads approx...

      Comment

      • lh3
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 686

        #4
        when the error rate is high, bwa is slow. you may also consider to apply -q20.

        Comment

        • bioinfosm
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2008
          • 483

          #5
          How are people working off of bwa alignments to call snp/indels? I know of samtools and varscan, but people with experience on which to prefer and why...

          In my experience, bwa/samtools was reporting many more events than maq followed by maq's snpfilter, which meant more false positives, which would be good to filter out.
          --
          bioinfosm

          Comment

          • lh3
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 686

            #6
            The equivalence to maq+snpfilter is bwa+samtools+"*varfilter*".

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...