Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Bowtie Index Question

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bowtie Index Question

    Dear all,

    I have a short question about bowtie index:

    What is the difference between these two mouse index:

    M. musculus, UCSC mm9 and M. musculus, NCBI v37

    Sorry for this, but just have no clue the difference between them.

    Many thanks!
    Wei

  • #2
    Hi Wei,

    They contain the same sequences, but use different sequence names. mm9 uses the UCSC naming scheme, with names like "chr1", "chr2", etc. NCBI v37 uses the NCBI naming scheme, with names like "gi|149288852|ref|NC_000067.5|NC_000067", "gi|149288852|ref|NC_000067.5|NC_000068", etc.

    Thanks,
    Ben

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Ben,

      Thanks a lot for your reply and explanation!

      They were built from the same assembly: NCBI m37 mouse assembly (April 2007, strain C57BL/6J) (which is also called UCSC version mm9), right?

      And another question is these two prebuilt index were built from which version chromosome sequence Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.56 or Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.57 (according to Ensemble)? Because I have run Tophat with mm9 prebuilt index, and then I need each chromosome sequence to run other downstream program. But on Ensemble, the chromosome version has been updated from Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.56 to Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.57. In order to keep consistent with mm9 index, which version chromosome I should use?

      Thank you Ben!

      Wei

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Wei-HD View Post
        They were built from the same assembly: NCBI m37 mouse assembly (April 2007, strain C57BL/6J) (which is also called UCSC version mm9), right?
        Right.


        Originally posted by Wei-HD View Post
        And another question is these two prebuilt index were built from which version chromosome sequence Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.56 or Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.57 (according to Ensemble)? Because I have run Tophat with mm9 prebuilt index, and then I need each chromosome sequence to run other downstream program. But on Ensemble, the chromosome version has been updated from Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.56 to Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.57. In order to keep consistent with mm9 index, which version chromosome I should use?
        According to those filenames, they should both be compatible with NBCI37/mm9 (that's what the "NCBIM37" part denotes). In fact, Ensembl versions going back to 47 seem to be compatible with NBCI37; you have to go back to 46 before it changes to NCBI36.

        Thanks,
        Ben

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you very much Ben!

          Best,
          Wei

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi,

            I have a question about bowtie index, I though this is the right forum to post it.

            What exactly bowtie indexes?
            I've read :

            BWT (same size as T)
            Checkpoints (~15% size of T)
            SA sample (~50% size of T)

            I understand the BWT and Checkpoints, but what is SA sample?

            Thanks

            --- problem solved, thanks
            Last edited by [email protected]; 08-03-2010, 11:24 AM.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 05-31-2023, 07:50 AM
            0 responses
            4 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 05-26-2023, 09:22 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X