Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gene_x
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 108

    #1

    Uniquely mapped reads and difference for single end and paired end reads

    I know there have been a few posts on seqanswers and biostars that asked about how to get uniquely mapped reads.

    As Heng Li put it,
    "Uniquely mappable read" is never satisfactorily defined.
    and
    Looking at mapping quality is not only the simplest but also the best solution in most cases.
    So I thought I would just use a mapping quality cutoff, say 30, to filter out reads to get uniquely mapped reads.

    This is simple for single end reads. I'm not sure how to do it for paired end reads since you have two mapping quality numbers. How should it be done?
    Last edited by gene_x; 01-12-2015, 02:53 PM.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    There's no general answer to this, it depends on the aligner. Many aligners will give both reads in a pair the same MAPQ as long as they aren't aligned as singletons. In that case, the same MAPQ will work (though a cutoff of 30 seems extreme). Otherwise, it depends on whether the aligner adds an aux tag to one of the alignments. Note that it's completely possible for only one read of a pair to be multi-mapping, such as when one end of a fragment overlaps a simple tandem repeat...though in practice I've not run into this enough to worry about (after all, you have biological replicates, so a bit of noise in each sample should be fine).

    Comment

    • gene_x
      Senior Member
      • May 2010
      • 108

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      There's no general answer to this, it depends on the aligner. Many aligners will give both reads in a pair the same MAPQ as long as they aren't aligned as singletons. In that case, the same MAPQ will work (though a cutoff of 30 seems extreme). Otherwise, it depends on whether the aligner adds an aux tag to one of the alignments. Note that it's completely possible for only one read of a pair to be multi-mapping, such as when one end of a fragment overlaps a simple tandem repeat...though in practice I've not run into this enough to worry about (after all, you have biological replicates, so a bit of noise in each sample should be fine).
      I see. I tried to count the number of properly paired reads with MAPQ either larger than 10 or smaller than 10. I observed about 1% of the read pairs have one read with MAPQ >=10 and the other read with MAPQ <10.

      PS: The alignment was done with novoalign.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      67 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      47 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...