Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Quat
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 8

    DESeq2 Transcriptome Analysis

    Hello,

    I'm trying to put a pipeline together for someone which will result in a transcriptome analysis with deseq2 in the end and I'm having some issues.

    There isn't a reference genome for the organism. What we've done is assemble the transcriptome sequencing (illumina). We then aligned the reads back to the contigs using bowtie2.

    We'd like to analyze the resulting bam/sam files with DESeq2, but most of the functions to read bam alignments require a DTF or other annotation.

    Is DESeq2 appropriate for this sort of analysis and is there a function to create a summarizedexperiment object from bam files without an annotation?

    Thanks
  • Michael Love
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 333

    #2
    hi,

    DESeq is not designed for analysis at the transcript level, because there are many reads which are shared between transcripts of a gene. Therefore you cannot generate raw counts of reads which *uniquely* align to the features. DESeq requires that one can identify all the exons of a gene, and can generate the count of reads which can be uniquely aligned to that gene. Simon explains this in more depth here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioco...ry/043410.html

    Software such as BitSeq or Cuffdiff will perform analysis at the transcript level.

    The Bioconductor project aims to develop and share open source software for precise and repeatable analysis of biological data. We foster an inclusive and collaborative community of developers and data scientists.

    Comment

    • Quat
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks, I'm giving bitseq a try.

      I've seen people use bowtie to report only the best match and then run DESeq, but Im guessing that isn't appropriate.

      Comment

      • ickou
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 8

        #4

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...