Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anecsulea
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 12

    #1

    problem running TopHat

    Dear all,

    I would like to ask your help with a problem that I've encountered while running TopHat. I wanted to test if the results that I obtain with TopHat are reproducible (if I run the program several times with the same parameters, on the exact same data, do I get the same results ?). This is not the case, I find that sometimes TopHat crashes without warning, and gives only what I call truncated results - i.e. relatively few predicted junctions as compared to what is expected, or to what is found in other runs.

    Here are some details about what I'm doing: I have 76bp-long, single-end reads. I'm using TopHat v1.0.13, with Bowtie 0.12.3, on a Linux computer with x86_64 architecture. I'm running TopHat with the following parameters:

    -p 1 -a 8 -i 40 -m 1 -I 1000000 -F 0 --coverage-search --microexon-search


    For one of the runs where I get truncated results, I have noticed this weird thing in the output:

    [Thu May 27 17:25:49 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Thu May 27 17:25:50 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Thu May 27 17:25:51 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie

    The weird thing is that mapping the reads against segment_juncs should take a lot more time, since I have about 20 million reads. So I thought that there might be an error in building the bowtie index for the splice junctions, but the bowtie_build.log shows no erorr. However, I find the following errors in some other log files from the run:

    ############################################

    file18CIUx.log:

    Could not locate a Bowtie index corresponding to basename "/scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs"
    Command: bowtie -q -v 2 -p 1 -k 40 -m 40 /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthos
    plice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar//tmp/left_kept_reads_seg3.fq

    ############################################

    filebd4xji.log

    Error reading ebwt array: returned 41750080, length was 168445184
    Your index files may be corrupt; please try re-building or re-downloading.
    A complete index consists of 6 files: XYZ.1.ebwt, XYZ.2.ebwt, XYZ.3.ebwt,
    XYZ.4.ebwt, XYZ.rev.1.ebwt, and XYZ.rev.2.ebwt. The XYZ.1.ebwt and
    XYZ.rev.1.ebwt files should have the same size, as should the XYZ.2.ebwt and
    XYZ.rev.2.ebwt files.
    Command: bowtie -q -v 2 -p 1 -k 40 -m 40 /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthos
    plice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar//tmp/left_kept_reads_seg3.fq


    ############################################

    So it does seem that TopHat cannot read the index files that were built with Bowtie. I do not understand why that would be - has anyone come across the same problem ?

    What I also don't understand is how is it possible that TopHat can still output some junctions (the "truncated" junctions.bed file is not empty, just smaller than on a normal run) if it cannot read the bowtie index for the junction sequences.


    I would be grateful if you can give me some comments or suggestions on how I could solve this problem. Thank you !

    Best,

    Anamaria
  • stoker
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 17

    #2
    Reply

    Probably your bowtie has problems with reading from indexes path.
    This thread may be helpful:

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc
    Tomasz Stokowy
    www.sequencing.io.gliwice.pl

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...