Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • loloyohe
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 4

    fastx-toolkit Abort trap: 6 error

    Hi everyone!

    Running the fastx-toolkit for my HiSeq data--using the standard protocol I have been in the past for previous data.

    When I run fastq_quality_filter on Mac OSX Mavericks, I get a maddening error:

    fastq_quality_filter -i seq_1.fq -o seq_1_fastxtrimmed.fastq -q 20 -p 80 -Q 33 -v
    Abort trap: 6

    When I use sudo with the command, the error goes away but the command still does not run. I have tried uninstalling and re-installing fastx-toolkit. Anyone else have this issue? Is this a problem with fastx-toolkit on Mavericks? I've been Googling for hours but it has not helped. Thanks!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Have you tried to recompile from source?

    Comment

    • loloyohe
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 4

      #3
      I have installed fastx-toolkit with homebrew. I uninstalled with homebrew and then reinstalled it in homebrew. I also upgraded the fastx-toolkit within homebrew, so in theory all of this brewing involves recompiling. I could try from scratch installing, but wanted to see if other people have also run into the issue.

      Comment

      • loloyohe
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2015
        • 4

        #4
        Update: I have uninstalled all associated homebrew versions and then reinstalled and recompiled completely from source. Still have the same error.

        Comment

        • Brian Bushnell
          Super Moderator
          • Jan 2014
          • 2709

          #5
          Well... fastx has some disadvantages in terms of speed and lack of support for paired files, not to mention the fact that it uses a sub-par trimming algorithm. You might try BBDuk, which runs on Mac without needing recompilation, does quality-trimming or filtering much faster than fastx, and supports paired reads.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            No arguments on BBDuk ..

            As noted in the original post, loloyohe is trying to follow a previously established protocol which used fastx.

            @loloyohe: Is the current dataset significantly larger?

            Comment

            • loloyohe
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2015
              • 4

              #7
              Thank you, both for the reply. The new files are ~8GB compared to the previous of 4GB so I suppose a memory issue is possible. Something tells me it is a compiling and compatibility issue with Mavericks. I uninstalled the most recent versions and reverted to the previous version in the hopes it was more stable. A new set of errors, but after troubleshooting the installation fastx-toolkit functions appear to be working fine. I have posted a resolution here. I can't say it "solved" the problem, but at least people can move forward.

              Brian, while troubleshooting fastx-toolkit, I have BBtools up and running and trimming! Thanks for the suggestion--it seems like a better option for me and I look forward to seeing what it can do!

              Comment

              • AlexReynolds
                Member
                • Feb 2013
                • 45

                #8
                That error usually means that the process ran out of usable memory. This can be due to either the program trying to allocate more space than is available, or there is a memory leak that is exposed with a larger input file. You might contact the developers and file a report.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  Yesterday, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                18 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                52 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                111 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...