Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boel
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 62

    cuffmerge not merging?

    Hi All,
    I have ran:
    tophat (w transcriptome index) -> cufflinks (-g & -M) -> cuffmerge -> cuffquant (-M) -> cuffnorm
    on a set of >300 samples. In the resulting counts table I have duplicated entries for many genes (thousands).

    For example:
    $ grep MORN1 ./cuffnorm_out/genes.attr_table
    XLOC_000065 - - XLOC_000065 MORN1 TSS126 1:2252451-2323157 -
    XLOC_000067 - - XLOC_000067 MORN1 TSS129 1:2252451-2323157 -
    XLOC_000068 - - XLOC_000068 MORN1 TSS130 1:2252451-2323157 -
    XLOC_000069 - - XLOC_000069 MORN1 TSS131 1:2252451-2323157 -
    XLOC_002153 - - XLOC_002153 MORN1,RP4-740C4.6,RP4-740C4.9 TSS5397,TSS5398,TSS5399,TSS5400 1:2252451-2323157 -
    $ grep RP11-206L10.9 ./cuffnorm_out/genes.attr_table
    XLOC_000013 - - XLOC_000013 RP11-206L10.9 TSS15 1:645707-762902 -
    XLOC_000014 - - XLOC_000014 RP11-206L10.9 TSS16,TSS17 1:645707-762902 -
    These genes has multiple transcripts with different transcription start sites, but several overlapping exons.

    These duplicated genes are also in the merged GTF resulting from the cuffmerge step. Should these not be merged, and do you have any idea of why they were not?

    I've used tophat v. 2.0.12 (bowtie2 v.2.2.3), cufflinks v.2.2.1 with hg19 and a gencode GTF (v.19). No warnings or errors regarding duplicated IDs along the way.

    Any ideas or comments very welcome.

    Thanks,
    Bo

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
0 responses
4 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...