Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tellsparck
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 19

    #1

    Optimum insert size for De-novo transcriptome assembly

    I am making RNA-Seq libraries from mouse tissue for de-novo transcriptome assembly. I am planning to use cufflinks for this (the genome guided denovo assembly approach). What insert size is optimal for this? Since we are aligning to a well annotated genome, does it make sense to have a higher average insert size? This way, many more reads will span more than one exon with paired end sequencing, Won't this boost chances of finding alternative spliced isoforms? But does this entail sacrificing info on 3' and 5' end which is equally important (an important goal of our study is to find alternate 3' ends of genes)?
    Thanks for your inputs!
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I think a broad range of insert sizes is good, particularly if you are interested in short transcripts that may not be represented at all if you filter out short inserts. The less size-selection, the less bias (aside from remove fragments that are too short to be useful or too long to amplify), and the greater the library uniqueness, which is important for assembly.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      How Immunogenomics Decodes Immunity’s Genetic Blueprint
      by SEQadmin2




      The immune system’s power comes from its genetic diversity, allowing myriad threats to be neutralized through first recognizing foreign antigens. That diversity is also what makes the immune system so difficult to study. Recent advances in sequencing technology and computational biology, however, are giving researchers new tools to understand immune responses and immune-related diseases in greater detail.

      This convergence of genetics, immunology, and computation...
      Today, 05:41 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
    0 responses
    50 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...