Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #16
    I generally never use the --use-bases-mask so I will defer to HESmith's expertise.

    Dropping the --use-bases-mask altogether and using a samplesheet with 7bp indexes should work as well. That should produce three files: R1 - First read, R2- Second tag or whatever is there, R3 - Should be the real read 2. When the edited RunInfo.xml file is used.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 02-18-2015, 03:44 PM.

    Comment

    • HESmith
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 512

      #17
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      Dropping the --use-bases-mask altogether and using a samplesheet with 7bp indexes should work as well. That should produce three files: R1 - First read, R2- Second tag or whatever is there, R3 - Should be the real read 2.
      This will work only if you know what the second index sequence is supposed to be for the single indexed libraries, so that it can be provided in the sample sheet. Admittedly, it should be straightforward to determine, if you understand how the second index read is generated and you have the adapter sequences for the single indexed libraries at hand.

      The inability to treat different lanes as different types of libraries is a real limitation of Illumina's approach to demultiplexing. Use-bases-mask functions at the level of the entire flow cell, which necessitates multiple passes at demultiplexing in cases like this one.

      (This response assumed an unedited RunInfo.xml; see subsequent reply re: edited RunInfo.xml)
      Last edited by HESmith; 02-18-2015, 04:09 PM. Reason: clarification

      Comment

      • HESmith
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 512

        #18
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        When the edited RunInfo.xml file is used.
        Yes, the edited RunInfo.xml treats the second read as the index (IsIndexedRead="Y"), and all other reads as data (IsIndexedRead="N"). So, R1 becomes read 1 data (101bp), R3 becomes read 2 data (8bp), and R4 becomes read 3 data (101bp). So it would be necessary to delete read 2 and rename read 3.

        Seems more straightforward just to employ --use-bases-mask and get the output you want.
        Last edited by HESmith; 02-18-2015, 04:12 PM. Reason: Clarification

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #19
          @HESmith: If you are sure that --use-bases-mask (as you had suggested) is going to work then it is the straightforward option.

          That said I went back and re-tested --use-bases-mask Y*,I6n,Y* option. Since read 3 is no longer designated as an index read one does not need the additional n* after I6n. You should get the three read files that we have already talked about.

          Comment

          • emixaM
            Member
            • May 2011
            • 26

            #20
            So,

            I used the original RunInfo.xml and Y101,I6n*,n*, Y101 and --ignore-missing-bcl and I can see :
            Code:
            [2015-02-19 13:54:06]	[r102-n81]	[all]	INFO: all completed successfully.
            THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR HELP!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2




              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
              Today, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            68 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...