Tweet
Hi, can someone explain what are the differences between targets and baits in exome sequencing? I'm running picard HsMetrics to compute some statistics for exome seq bam files. I've read that "bait" and "target" are very similar in other threads but I'd like to understand the concept behind the two. I'm currently using the same file for data prepared using Agilent SureSelect.
-
-
Well the targets are the things you're trying to capture (generally exons). The baits are the things you use to do the capture.
They don't always overlap as much as you think. Sometimes a bait will be offset to a target due to thermodynamic constraints on positioning or design algorithms trying to avoid repetitive/low complexity sequence.
Hence a read can be:
On bait and on target
On bait but off target
Off bait and off target (noise)
Generally it doesn't matter if you use the targets file to define the metrics - after all, that is what you're interested in. It's not like you're going to go and assess the performance of all the baits in a SureSelect kit..
-
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...Yesterday, 11:10 AM -
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
Comment