Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • horvathdp
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 66

    #1

    best assembler for 160PE and 100PE reads

    Hi all,
    I have about 60X combined coverage of my genome, but half of my reads are 100 base paired end reads and the other half is 160 base paired end reads. Any suggestions for which assembler would be the best one to use for a combined file of both read sets?

    I have removed the high and low kmer read sets (since I really am primarily interested in single and low-copy regions of my genome) and total I have about 20GB of sequence for each end. I ran the Trinity Kmer reduction program (max of 30 X coverage/kmer) on my PE100 file and only reduced it from about 8GB to 5GB per end. This is about what I would have expected given my initial kmer selection scheme. The attempt to do this with the PE160 files failed for an unknown reason, but I would expect it to also would give me about a 40% reduction. Thus, I could probably -with some effort, get my combined files down to about 12Gb each before attempting the assembly.

    Any advice about the best assembler or other strategies to assist in assembling my low-copy genome space (which should contain the bulk of my genes) is welcome.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
74 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...