Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alun3.1
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2015
    • 8

    #1

    Assembly quality RSEM-EVAL failing

    Hi,

    I am trying to run rsem-eval from the Detonate 1.8.1 package to assess the quality of a transcriptome assembly.

    I use the following command (on a cluster with ncpus=8:mem=20G):
    Code:
    rsem-eval-calculate-score -p 8 --no-qualities reads.fasta contigs.fasta RSEM_EVAL_Trinity 290
    It outputs 2 folders containing the following files:
    Code:
    RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.temp/
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.1.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.2.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.3.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.4.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity_alignable.fa
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity_alignable.fa.ridx
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.bam
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.dat
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.gene_res
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.grp
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.idx.fa
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.iso_res
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.mparams
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.n2g.idx.fa
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.omit              #(file is empty)
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.rev.1.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.rev.2.ebwt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.seq
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.ti
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.transcripts.fa
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity_un.fa 
    
    RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.stat/
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.cnt
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.model
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.ofg
       RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.theta
    and the following error on the ".e" file:
    Code:
    [samopen] SAM header is present: 114771 sequences.
    # reads processed: 21035514
    # reads with at least one reported alignment: 17667698 (83.99%)
    # reads that failed to align: 3355968 (15.95%)
    # reads with alignments suppressed due to -m: 11848 (0.06%)
    Reported 31243626 alignments to 1 output stream(s)
    rsem-run-em: CalcEvalScore.h:144: CalcEvalScore::CalcEvalScore(Refs&, double, double, int, int, char*, char*): Assertion `N1 == s.size() - 1' failed.
    and this on the tail of the ".o" file:
    Code:
    ...
    ROUND = 2643, SUM = 20985873.0000002, bChange = 0.00142121, totNum = 1
    ROUND = 2644, SUM = 20985873.0000002, bChange = 0.000495484, totNum = 0
    Expression Results are written!
    "rsem-run-em RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.temp/RSEM_EVAL_Trinity 0 RSEM_EVAL_Trinity RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.temp/RSEM_EVAL_Trinity RSEM_EVAL_Trinity.stat/RSEM_EVAL_Trinity -p 8 --calc-evaluation-score 4.24632071192940157 0.00672688390031380323 370 0" failed! Plase check if you provide correct parameters/options for the pipeline!
    I cannot figure out what is wrong. Did someone already have this problem?
  • Aghatusha
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 3

    #2
    Same here

    Have you found what's wrong with it? Trying to get the scores for assembly quality estimation, I've gotten the same output files.

    Comment

    • Aghatusha
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Resolved

      The problem is in lack of space on hard drive! I tried to run DETONATE on another computer with the same input and 1TB free memory - so it worked fine.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...