Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yueli
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 73

    miRNA differential expression software

    Hi,

    I'm currently analyzing small-RNA-seq data coming from 2 different samples which only have *.fasta format. Unfortunately they do no have replicates.

    Which software that I can use to analyze their differential expression?

    Following is the format of my data. t0000001 is ID, and 537124 is the reads number.

    Any suggestions are appreciate!

    li



    >t0000001_x537124
    CCCGACCTCAGATCAGATGA
    >t0000002_x340107
    TCACCGGGTAGACATTCATTAT
    >t0000003_x268409
    TGAAAGACATGGGTAGTGAGAT
    >t0000004_x172657
    CGATATGTGGTAATTTGGATGA
    >t0000005_x154782
    AGAGGTAGTGATTCAAAAAGTT
    >t0000006_x140076
    TCACCGGGTAGACATTCATTATA
    >t0000007_x131590
    TGAGATCACTATGAAAGCTGG
    >t0000008_x125368
    TGAGGTAGAATGTTGGATGACT
    >t0000009_x120455
    TGAGTATTGCATCAAGAACCGA
    >t0000010_x95804
    TCCCTGAGACCATTGACTGCAT
    >t0000011_x78210
    TGGACGGAAGTGTAATGAGGGT
    >t0000012_x73438
    TGAGGTAGATTGTTGGATGACT
    >t0000013_x68884
    CCCGACCTCAGATCAGATG
    >t0000014_x60358
    TGAAAGACACAGGTAGTGGGACA
    >t0000015_x59786
    TGGAATGTCGAGAAATATGCAT
    >t0000016_x44935
    TCCCTGAGACCATTGACT
  • diego diaz
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 62

    #2
    Usually it's not recommended analyze differential expression when you don't have replicates, but if you want to try anyway, you could map your reads to your reference genome with bowtie (bowtie supports fasta format), then count the number of reads per microRNA gene with htseq-count and finally perform differential expression analysis with Deseq2.

    In this thread, Deseq2's author (Simon Anders) explains how to perform the differential expression analysis when you don't have replicates!




    To map your reads with bowtie you could use the following configuration,

    -m 1 and -v 0, with m 1, all reads with more than one valid alignment are suppressed (it is a way to keep only uniquely mapped reads) and v is used to allow 0 mismatch.

    Alternatively, you could use the following configuration

    -l 15 , -n 0, -k 1 --best, -l and -n specify that n mismatch are allowed in the first l bases, and k specify the number of alignment reported. --best is to report the best, if more than one valid alignment exists


    I hope it will be useful!
    Last edited by diego diaz; 03-24-2015, 06:18 AM.

    Comment

    • yueli
      Member
      • May 2013
      • 73

      #3
      Hi,

      Diego diaz.

      Thanks a lot! I try to use Deseq2 to perform my analysis,

      Li

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...