Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wilflugo
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 8

    #1

    'N-Blocks' or Any Nucleotide Alignments Best Practices

    How 'N-blocks' in a genome are normally handled on a Local and/or global alignment computation?
    I have been reading about this but seems I can't find what the 'best' practice should be. I see some tools that remove all N-blocks from a chromosome before doing the alignments and others assign a penalty whenever a nucleotide is compared against a 'N' nucleotide.

    As far as I understand (and I may be wrong) 'N' is an unknown nucleotide that has not being decoded. Thus in theory could be any one. However, if I assigned a match on a large N-block region, all individual reads are mapped incorrectly(?) into that region since the alignment see an exact match with all the highest scores into that region.

    Should N-blocks be simply trimmed out of the chromosome? Is there any other methodology to follow when doing alignments between reads and chromosomes (Assembly)?

    Sorry if this is common knowledge, but turns out that searching for 'N-blocks' is not a wise search key since it matches almost everything that is not relevant to this topic.

    thanks.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Aligners generally ignore large blocks of Ns, or replace them with random sequence (which is not expected to match a read). When you align reads to chromosomes, just leave the Ns there, they won't hurt anything. If you remove them, your coordinates will get messed up.

    Comment

    • wilflugo
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2014
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks!. Haven't thought about the random sequence. Thank makes sense and it is probably the way I will be going.

      However, I am a little bit curious, how can you ignore N blocks when using optimal local alignment algorithms like Smith-Waterman where scores are based on match/mismatches on a pair of nucleotides?

      You could score 'zero' on all Ns, but depending on the similarity matrix used, zero could be a valid penalty value. I guess that ignoring a block need to be addressed case by case and depending on the statistical significance of the similarity matrix.

      thanks again.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        BBMap, for example, assigns a positive score for a match, negative score for a mismatch, and 0 if either the reference or read are N. For nucleotide alignment similarity matrices are not used; those are for amino acid alignment.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...