Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Giorgio
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 4

    #1

    Trinity assembly validation and statistics

    Hi All,

    After one week Trinity finally completed an assembly starting with 800 million reads (an entire Next Seq 500 run). The statistics are weird, although there were tons of sequences, but I would like your opinion:

    ################################

    ## Counts of transcripts, etc.

    ################################

    Total trinity 'genes': 858807

    Total trinity transcripts: 924905

    Percent GC: 40.20



    ########################################

    Stats based on ALL transcript contigs:

    ########################################



    Contig N10: 1739

    Contig N20: 769

    Contig N30: 490

    Contig N40: 382

    Contig N50: 324



    Median contig length: 270

    Average contig: 363.98

    Total assembled bases: 336649200





    #####################################################

    ## Stats based on ONLY LONGEST ISOFORM per 'GENE':

    #####################################################



    Contig N10: 1123

    Contig N20: 575

    Contig N30: 421

    Contig N40: 349

    Contig N50: 304



    Median contig length: 268

    Average contig: 341.45

    Total assembled bases: 293239534

    I used Trinity with default parameters and using --trimmomatic plus --min_kmer_cov 2. I really was expecting the N50 to be bigger. What can be the reason for that?

    Note: Before starting the assembly I quality filtered the sequences and merged the results in two big paired end fasta files.



    Please any advice can be precious!

    Thanks!

    Giorgio
  • sarika01
    Junior Member
    • May 2015
    • 2

    #2
    hello I
    I have used trinity for assembly..it give trinity.fatsa file and have 4785 sequences...but whn i run statics program it shown 5000 genes...pls help wht does it mean.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...