Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elizabeth000
    Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 21

    #1

    Working with DGEExact objects in a loop

    Objects of class DGEExact are the result of the exactTest() function in edgeR. I'm having trouble making loops to assign DGEExact objects to a variable. I'm probably making some very basic mistake in handling R data types...?

    > nlevels(data$samples$group)
    [1] 8

    Code:
    for(i in 1:nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
       index = 1
       while(index < nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
          extest[i] = exactTest(data, pair=c(i,1+index),)
          index = index + 1
       }
    }
    Error in extest[i] = exactTest(data, pair = c(i, 1 + index), ) :
    object 'extest' not found

    Sorry for the basic question, I hope it is easy to answer!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    You need to create "extext" beforehand, that's why it's complaining that it can't be found. Just add this above your while loop:
    Code:
    extest = c()
    Of course, you'll have to deal with extest after the while loop or it'll get over-written.

    Comment

    • elizabeth000
      Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 21

      #3
      Thank you for your fast reply. Yes, this was completely wrong, and I fixed a few problems. Here is the complete loop:

      Code:
      extest = c()
      k = 1
      for(i in 1:nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
         print(c(i,"i"))
         for(j in (i+1):nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
            if (i < nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
               extest[k] = exactTest(data, pair=c(i,j))
               k = k+1
            }
         }
      }
      This is improved because it tests each pair only once, and I prevented extest from being overwritten. But... extest[k] is not structured as expected... for example, I cannot view head(extest[1]), the whole list prints to screen. And:

      > extest[1]$comparison
      NULL

      How can this strange behavior be explained? Is there any way to store DGEExact objects in a list or other R class?

      Comment

      • elizabeth000
        Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 21

        #4
        I find that extest[1] is a list:

        > class(extest[1])
        [1] "list"

        whereas it should be:

        > class(extest)
        [1] "DGEExact"
        attr(,"package")
        [1] "edgeR"

        So I need to find out how to store the DGEExact objects somewhere while creating them in the loop. There must be a way to do this????

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          You might have to change extest to a list itself, since I'm not sure how/if coercion works in this scenario.

          Comment

          • elizabeth000
            Member
            • Apr 2015
            • 21

            #6
            By declaring extest as a list:

            Code:
            extest = list()
            k = 1
            for(i in 1:nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
               #print(c(i,"i"))
               for(j in (i+1):nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                  if (i < nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                     extest[k] = exactTest(data, pair=c(i,j))
                     #print(et$table)
                     k = k+1
                  }
               }
            }
            I get this warning for each execution of exactTest:
            28: In extest[k] = exactTest(data, pair = c(i, j)) :
            number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length

            > class(extest)
            [1] "list"
            > class(extest[1])
            [1] "list"

            Comment

            • dpryan
              Devon Ryan
              • Jul 2011
              • 3478

              #7
              Not sure then, I'd have to play around with it. You might just play around with making a list of two instance by hand.

              Comment

              • elizabeth000
                Member
                • Apr 2015
                • 21

                #8
                > first = exactTest(data,pair=c(1,2))
                > second = exactTest(data,pair=c(2,3))
                > results = list(first,second)
                > results
                [[1]]
                An object of class "DGEExact"
                $table
                logFC logCPM PValue
                CGI_10000009 -2.3851234 1.493044 0.1171040419
                CGI_10000013 0.1844446 4.147738 0.7403461115
                CGI_10000014 -4.9376158 2.707417 0.0001137864
                CGI_10000015 0.4967844 3.773692 0.4339343285
                CGI_10000028 -0.2890212 2.476181 0.9883519753
                18055 more rows ...

                $comparison
                [1] "28cell" "blastula"

                $genes
                NULL


                [[2]]
                An object of class "DGEExact"
                $table
                logFC logCPM PValue
                CGI_10000009 -2.57188463 1.493044 0.8000000
                CGI_10000013 0.01444976 4.147738 1.0000000
                CGI_10000014 0.41462168 2.707417 0.9686494
                CGI_10000015 -0.36575812 3.773692 0.6137249
                CGI_10000028 0.64099475 2.476181 0.7954756
                18055 more rows ...

                $comparison
                [1] "blastula" "dlarvae"

                $genes
                NULL

                That seems to work... so why doesn't it work in my loop...

                Comment

                • dpryan
                  Devon Ryan
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 3478

                  #9
                  Try making the empty list first and then adding to it, since that will match all the coercion processes going on in in your real code.

                  Comment

                  • elizabeth000
                    Member
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 21

                    #10
                    Yes, that's what I was thinking. Instead of filling indices with list objects, I should append the new result to the list. Hmmmm but how do I do that in R?
                    I'm drawing a blank...

                    Comment

                    • elizabeth000
                      Member
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 21

                      #11
                      For the moment this works, but is really not ideal.
                      Code:
                      for(i in 1:nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                         for(j in (i+1):nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                            if (i < nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                               et = exactTest(data, pair=c(i,j))
                               filen = paste("/media/liz/ACERDATA/Elizabeth_DATA/exacttest_dev_cds", i, j, ".txt", sep="")
                               #Open output file
                               sink(filen)
                               print(et$comparison)
                               print(topTags(et, n=100))
                               #Close output file
                               sink()
                            }
                         }
                      }

                      Comment

                      • elizabeth000
                        Member
                        • Apr 2015
                        • 21

                        #12
                        Actually the solution was super easy! You have to use double [[ to index a list! This works:

                        Code:
                        extest = list()
                        k = 1
                        for(i in 1:nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                           for(j in (i+1):nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                              if (i < nlevels(data$samples$group)) {
                                 extest[[k]] = exactTest(data, pair=c(i,j))
                                 k = k+1
                              }
                           }
                        }

                        Comment

                        Latest Articles

                        Collapse

                        • SEQadmin2
                          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                          by SEQadmin2



                          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                          ...
                          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                        • SEQadmin2
                          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                          by SEQadmin2


                          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                          ...
                          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                        • SEQadmin2
                          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                          by SEQadmin2



                          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                          ...
                          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

                        ad_right_rmr

                        Collapse

                        News

                        Collapse

                        Topics Statistics Last Post
                        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
                        0 responses
                        13 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                        0 responses
                        26 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                        0 responses
                        20 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                        0 responses
                        19 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Working...