Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dietmar13
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 107

    BBMap for BitSeq

    Hello,

    I want use BBmap for estimating transcript expression level from RNA-seq reads. Mapped will be against transcripts, not the genome.

    The Manual for BitSeq uses Bowtie with following conditions:

    Code:
    bowtie -q -v 3 -3 0 -p 4 -a -m 100 --sam
    3 mismatches allowed
    no 3' trimming (and no 5' trimming) - both default
    report reads only if < 100 possible mapping positions


    how should the BBmap parameters look like?

    Code:
    bbmap.sh ambiguous=all maxsites2=100 ( secondary=TRUE sssr=0.95 maxsites=100 )
    is there a parameter for allowed mismatches per read?
    will "secondary=TRUE sssr=0.95 maxsites=100" be a good idea for mapping reads to the human transcriptome. sssr=0.95 means approximate how many mismatches per 75 bases reads ~ 2?

    should the reads be trimmed and quality filtered before, and if yes with which parameters?

    Dietmar
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I imagine the main reason for specifying 3 mismatches with Bowtie is that 3 is the maximum it allows.

    BBMap normally adjusts sensitivity with the mind/minratio parameter, though you can optionally set "subfilter=3" to ban alignments with more than 3 substitutions. I don't see how that would be beneficial to transcriptome mapping, though.

    I would suggest:

    "bbmap.sh (file parameters) ambig=all maxsites=100 maxindel=100"

    ...and if you really want, add "subfilter=3". For transcriptome mapping there's no reason to allow the default maxindel=16000. And there is not much need to apply any quality-trimming or filtering unless you add the "subfilter" flag and have low-quality data, though you can do that if you want with "qtrim=rl trimq=10" to trim both ends to Q10. I do, however, always recommend adapter-trimming, particularly when requiring high-identity alignments.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...