Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kcarss
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 3

    Newbie stuck with Galaxy filter

    Hi

    I have a question about the filter function of Galaxy. I am new to NGS data analysis, and am not a bioinformatician!

    I am trying to identify SNPs from a large dataset (pileup format) amassed from 1000genomes data. I have filtered according to quality (20) and coverage (6), and checked the ‘variants only’ box, which gives me a dataset of 3.7 million lines.

    This dataset seems to include all lines where at least one of the reads specifies a variant, even if it is only 1 out of 6 or more reads, and even when the consensus base is the same as the reference. Therefore I have been trying to filter the dataset again using the filter function, to identify only those lines where the consensus base differs from the reference. This is where I am getting stuck.

    I have tried several things inc both filter and filter on ambiguities; using spaces vs no spaces in the expression; == vs != etc but I always get an error message something like:

    empty, format: interval, database: hg18
    Info: Filtering with c4==c5,
    kept 0.00% of 3680832 lines.
    Skipped 3680830 invalid lines starting at line #1: "chr10 52984 52985 C C 30 0 12 6 T,..,, @ACCCA !-!!08 0 5 0 1 6"

    I can’t figure out what I am doing wrong!

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  • culmen
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 12

    #2
    Hi Kcarss,

    I am also stuck up with same kind of problem. Have you solved that? If so can please let me know the trick.
    As you mentioned,
    Amassed large dataset from 1000genomes data
    Have you downloaded the entire data from 1000genomes ftp? I find some computing problems in downloading too?

    Thanks a lot,
    Culmen

    Comment

    • kcarss
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 3

      #3
      Hi Culmen

      I never did solve that problem I'm afraid.

      I downloaded all of the 1000genomes sequencing data of one individual from pilot 2.

      K

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...