Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jk1124
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 17

    #1

    STAR unmapped: too short

    Hello,

    I recently mapped 8 RNA-Seq samples using STAR. The samples are paired. The data in log.final.out for each sample look very similar to the sample's partner - with one exception.

    I have one sample that shows 6.57% reads mapped to multiple loci and 32.38 % of reads unmapped: too short. It's partner shows 24.30% and 13.12%, respectively (these numbers more closely resemble the other samples). Uniquely mapped reads: roughly 60% for both.

    I am wondering why the first sample has such a high percentage of "unmapped:too short" reads. I've read that sequencing quality can affect this number, so I expected the the sample to be low quality. However, Fastqc shows that the sequencing length and base quality is very good (and similar) for both samples. Can anyone help me to explain this?

    Thanks for your help in advance!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Did you scan these samples with a trimming program (for adapters, adapter dimers, read-through etc) before you did the alignments? It is possible that quality/adapter contamination differs between the two. Until trimmed sequence length will always be identical for all reads (with the exception of those samples run on MiSeq and analyzed by MiSeq reporter on MiSeq).

    Comment

    • jk1124
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 17

      #3
      Thanks for your reply! I thought that if either of the samples were to have more adapter contamination, it would be the first sample (with a high number of reads unmapped:too short). Is my thinking correct?

      I tried trimming the reads for this sample but saw similar numbers when I mapped:

      Uniquely mapped reads % | 60.98%
      % of reads mapped to multiple loci | 6.61%
      % of reads unmapped: too short | 31.76%

      This is the command I used:

      java -jar Trimmomatic-0.33/trimmomatic-0.33.jar PE -phred33 R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz R1_paired.fq.gz R1_unpaired_fq.gz R2_paired.fq.gz R2_unpaired.fq.gz ILLUMINACLIP:Trimmomatic-0.33/adapters/TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10

      What do you think?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Grab a few of those unmapped reads and blast them against nt to see if you have chimeras or some contamination that you were not expecting (since they survived trimming but are not mapping with STAR).

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...