Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BioKiwi
    Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 19

    PacBio vs MinION

    To compare PacBio long reads with MinION for de novo assembly of bacterial genomes what one should consider for library prep and assembly.
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #2
    I am not sure what you are asking for. The PacBio option works: 1 library prep, sequence 1 SMRT-cell & assemble the data - you get a "finished" genome. If playing around with new technology is your goal, then the minion is worth considering.

    Comment

    • nucacidhunter
      Jafar Jabbari
      • Jan 2013
      • 1250

      #3
      If the aim is to compare performance of two platforms. I would use the same sheared and size selected DNA from a bacteria with reference genome to prepare libraries for each platform. Then would sequence them to a certain Mb or Gb (can subsample reads to equal bases if one platform output is higher than the other) and use them for assembly and alignment. Metrics such as N50 (L50), contig number, proportion of data used for assembly, evenness of coverage, gaps and GC biases can be used for comparison.
      Last edited by nucacidhunter; 06-19-2015, 06:34 PM.

      Comment

      • BioKiwi
        Member
        • Sep 2014
        • 19

        #4
        Thanks for replies. I wonder if I can use similar approach for transcript isoform analysis.

        Comment

        • Brian Bushnell
          Super Moderator
          • Jan 2014
          • 2709

          #5
          With mapping and assembly of DNA, to a known reference, it is relatively straightforward to determine which platform is better.

          With isoform analysis, you're bringing in a huge number of additional variables; you won't know the correct answer, so you will have very little ability to evaluate which platform is doing a better job.

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            I agree with Brian about isoform analysis potential issues. With current knowledge the best option is to access a well annotated fungal species with small genome or C. elegans (to keep sequencing cost down) and prepare full-length dscDNA from mRNA fraction using SMART technology and prepare libraries for both platforms. Transcripts sequences can be used for comparison against annotated regions and genome to compare the coverage of known isoforms and potential new isoform discovery of two platforms.

            Comment

            • maxsalm
              Member
              • Feb 2015
              • 18

              #7
              Another option may be to get in touch with the Snyder lab and study the same transcriptomes used in their exploration of PacBio long-reads:



              Comment

              • BioKiwi
                Member
                • Sep 2014
                • 19

                #8
                Thank you very much everyone for your posts. I have much clearer idea to plan my Honours project.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                0 responses
                28 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
                0 responses
                22 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...