Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dan.jo.di
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 2

    #1

    Bionumerics or CLC genomics Workbench?

    Hello everyone!

    I am starting with the analyses of some 5Mb bacterial genomes that were sequenced on illumina hiseq. I don’t need to do something very elaborate but I would like to quality filter, trim, assemble, annotate, check the main interest genes and compare it with some references sequences. For this type of non-programming analysis I heard that CLC genomics workbench and Bionumerics will be the best options. For both, I have the hypothesis of getting some specialized training. I tried both and it seems that CLC genomics is more user-friendly. What do think and what are the main advantages from each of them?

    Thanks a lot.

    dan.jo.di
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    If you are primarily a biologist not familiar with using unix command line then one of the GUI-based programs is an easy option. If you are willing to learn/spend time on command line then multiple options will become available.

    If you already have licenses available for the two programs you mention then go with the one you like. If you are still checking commercial programs out then look at Geneious.

    Comment

    • dan.jo.di
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2015
      • 2

      #3
      In fact, i'm not familiar at all with unix command and I do not have any skills to do so.
      I don't have any licenses at the moment, I was asking precisely to make an informed decision when I buy one. Do you think Geneious is the best option? Can you tell me why do you think so? For sure it is cheaper than CLC or Bionumerics.

      Thanks

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Most of these commercial packages have overlapping feature sets. Since all offer some sort of trial license you should make a decision about which one suits your needs best yourself.

        You could also try and find a local collaborator to help you with the analysis. This could be a good project for a bioinformatics student to work on.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...