Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ashuchawla
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 38

    #31
    I have ten samples total, 2C10 = 45 combinations

    Originally posted by Simon Anders View Post
    BTW, what did you mean by "pairwise comparisons would take me a long time"? Can't be more than a few minutes calculation time. The issue is rather: what would the result tell you?

    Comment

    • Simon Anders
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 995

      #32
      45 comparisons still would only take an hour or so. However, my feeling is that you are doing something fundamentally wrong if you are comparing pairs of samples, rather than pairs of conditions or time points.

      Maybe explain a bit more about the biology of your experiment.

      Comment

      • ashuchawla
        Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 38

        #33
        day 0
        sample 1 - untreated

        day 3
        sample 2 - treated with "A"
        sample 3 - treated with "B"
        sample 4 - treated with "C"

        day 6

        sample 5 - treated with "A"
        sample 6 - treated with "B"
        sample 7 - treated with "C"

        day 9

        sample 8 - treated with "A"
        sample 9 - treated with "B"
        sample 10 - treated with "C"

        They want to see DE across time as well as across treatments. I am just a bioinformatician. Some body else did the experiments and I have the rnaSeq data for it. This is all I have been told.

        Ashu

        Originally posted by Simon Anders View Post
        45 comparisons still would only take an hour or so. However, my feeling is that you are doing something fundamentally wrong if you are comparing pairs of samples, rather than pairs of conditions or time points.

        Maybe explain a bit more about the biology of your experiment.

        Comment

        • lucer105
          Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 12

          #34
          Originally posted by ashuchawla View Post
          day 0
          sample 1 - untreated

          day 3
          sample 2 - treated with "A"
          sample 3 - treated with "B"
          sample 4 - treated with "C"

          day 6

          sample 5 - treated with "A"
          sample 6 - treated with "B"
          sample 7 - treated with "C"

          day 9

          sample 8 - treated with "A"
          sample 9 - treated with "B"
          sample 10 - treated with "C"

          They want to see DE across time as well as across treatments. I am just a bioinformatician. Some body else did the experiments and I have the rnaSeq data for it. This is all I have been told.

          Ashu

          I think you need a "untreated" control for every time point, or the time will be a extra variable.

          Comment

          • gwilymh
            Member
            • Dec 2011
            • 72

            #35
            I think I have found a solution. CuffDiff actually does output a count of each feature (genes.count_tracking, cds.count_tracking, etc). I ran cuffDiff with each sample treated as a separate treatment, c.f. different samples from the same treatment being identified as replicates using the -L/--labels feature. This gave me count data for each feature in each sample.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2




              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
              Yesterday, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            71 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...