Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shmibble
    Member
    • May 2015
    • 23

    Qualimap Large Standard Deviation

    Hi,

    I'm using Qualimap for quality control in a pipeline.
    Under "Coverage" I get a standard deviation that is larger than the mean value. This seems a little suspicious. Does this mean there is likely some sort of problem?

    Thanks for the help
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I've never used Qualimap, but it's not unusual to have a standard deviation larger than the mean, depending on your experiment. Particularly with single-cell, or LMP libraries, or anything over-amplified, or other protocols that are expected to be highly biased. Can you give more details?

    Comment

    • shmibble
      Member
      • May 2015
      • 23

      #3
      Thanks for the reply.
      I am amplifying certain areas more than others. So that might be the issue.
      As I am still no expert in this, What would you recommend other than Qualimap?

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        Before I can recommend something, I'd need to know exactly what you're trying to measure. BBMap can generate the standard deviation and average coverage, but there's no reason to expect it would give a different answer. You are running an experiment with intentionally uneven coverage, so when you analyze the coverage and find that it is uneven, that should be what you expect.

        Comment

        • shmibble
          Member
          • May 2015
          • 23

          #5
          You're right. I guess I didn't think about that before. I don't really need a different program then.

          Thanks!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...